Comment by sj441...@naver.com:
integrate
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/wiki/SourceCode
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-issues@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
Comment #4 on issue 1227 by plaes...@gmail.com: Integration failure
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1227
This actually works when I specify that R, b and h are positive.
Should we document it somewhere in the gotchas section?
--
You received this message because you are
Status: Accepted
Owner: plaes...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium WrongResult
New issue 2447 by plaes...@gmail.com: ((-1)**Rational(1,3)).evalf() returns
wrong result
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2447
Ran into following gem today:
In [28]:
Status: Accepted
Owner: Vinzent.Steinberg
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Integration
New issue 2448 by Vinzent.Steinberg: integrate hangs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2448
Iz
(z, -L/2, L/2)
integrate(r0**2*cos(z)**2, Iz)
-r0**2*(-L/4 - sin(L/2)*cos(L/2)/2) +
Status: Accepted
Owner: Vinzent.Steinberg
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Integration
New issue 2449 by Vinzent.Steinberg: improve transform
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2449
var('w t')
(w, t)
i = Integral(cos(w*t), (t, 0, 1))
i.transform(w*t, t)
Status: Started
Owner: Vinzent.Steinberg
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Integration
New issue 2450 by Vinzent.Steinberg: pull free symbols out of Integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2450
For instance
Integral(cos(t)/w, (t, 0, w))
could be simplified to
Comment #24 on issue 1467 by matt...@gmail.com: sorting values with
imaginary numbers in radical
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1467
btw. For sorting expressions we have sort_key, e.g.:
In [1]: sorted([3, -I, I, 2 + I], key=lambda expr: sympify(expr).sort_key())
Out[1]: [3,
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #6 on issue 2404 by matt...@gmail.com: PolificationFailed needs to
be imported in polysys
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2404
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this
Comment #1 on issue 2448 by asmeurer: integrate hangs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2448
It doesn't hang for me. This is what I get. By the way, the problem is
not the extra symbols, but that the first integral is cos(x)**2 and the
second one is cos(x**2)**2 (due to the
Comment #1 on issue 2449 by asmeurer: improve transform
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2449
See also issue 2297.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to
Comment #10 on issue 1961 by asmeurer: integration works too hard
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1961
Issue 2450 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to this group, send email
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 1961
Comment #1 on issue 2450 by asmeurer: pull free symbols out of Integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2450
This has already been discussed, and rejected. Integral.doit() should pull
out constants (actually, it
Status: Accepted
Owner: asmeurer
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Low Printing
New issue 2451 by asmeurer: Position of power in pretty printed functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2451
We pretty print powers of functions before the args, like
In [8]: f(1/x)**2
Out[8]:
2
⎛1⎞
Updates:
Summary: Position of power (and function) in pretty printed functions
Comment #1 on issue 2451 by asmeurer: Position of power (and function) in
pretty printed functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2451
Thinking about it, I think it would look better for
Updates:
Summary: Implement heuristics for integrating common algebraic functions
Comment #5 on issue 1393 by asmeurer: Implement heuristics for integrating
common algebraic functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1393
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
Issue 1397: solve fails for a sum of two fractions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1397
This issue is now blocking issue 1227.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1227
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or
Issue 1393: Implement heuristics for integrating common algebraic functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1393
This issue is now blocking issue 1304.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1304
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Updates:
Blockedon: 1393
Comment #14 on issue 1304 by asmeurer: Integrate sqrt(x**2 + y**2) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1304
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues
Updates:
Blockedon: 1393
Comment #3 on issue 1020 by asmeurer: integrate(sqrt(y**2 - x**2)/x, x)
can't do it
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1020
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Issue 1393: Implement heuristics for integrating common algebraic functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1393
This issue is now blocking issue 1020.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1020
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Updates:
Blockedon: 1393
Comment #5 on issue 1323 by asmeurer: integrate(1/sqrt(16 + 4*x**2), x)
fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1323
The fix from issue 1393 would be a good fix.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Blockedon: 1393
Comment #1 on issue 1392 by asmeurer: integrate(x*sqrt(x**2+2*x+4), x)
can't do it yet
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1392
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Issue 1393: Implement heuristics for integrating common algebraic functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1393
This issue is now blocking issue 1323.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1323
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Comment #10 on issue 1393 by asmeurer: Implement heuristics for integrating
common algebraic functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1393
I've added a bunch of issues blocking this one. The heuristics should be
able to do the integrals from all of those.
--
You
Issue 1393: Implement heuristics for integrating common algebraic functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1393
This issue is now blocking issue 1394.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1394
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch
Blockedon: 1393
Comment #3 on issue 1394 by asmeurer: integrate(x*sqrt(1+2*x), x) can't do
it yet
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1394
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message
Updates:
Blockedon: 1393
Comment #4 on issue 2363 by asmeurer:
integrate(1/(x**2+y**2)**(Rational(3,2)),x) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2363
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Issue 1393: Implement heuristics for integrating common algebraic functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1393
This issue is now blocking issue 2363.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2363
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 2447 by asmeurer: ((-1)**Rational(1,3)).evalf() returns
wrong result
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2447
That isn't wrong. See http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(-1)**(1/3) (it
agrees to all the digits that SymPy
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #19 on issue 2305 by asmeurer: Integer.isqrt and similar shouldn't
be a method
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2305
Well, I didn't hear any more opinions, so I guess I'll just have to make a
decision.
Let's just leave them. It's
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #7 on issue 2411 by asmeurer: Revert _op_priority deletion
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2411
I pushed my branch. _op_priority will be in the release, though it will
eventually be replaced with something completely different (and
Comment #20 on issue 2305 by matt...@gmail.com: Integer.isqrt and similar
shouldn't be a method
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2305
As to those short cuts, there is no conflict between gcd() and
Integer.gcd(), e.g.:
In [9]: gcd(Integer(2), Integer(4))
Out[9]: 2
In [10]:
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Labels: asmeurer Ronan.Lamy
Comment #4 on issue 2420 by asmeurer: Refactor EPath
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2420
I made a patch from Ronan's pull request with just the commits I am +1 to
(see the discussion over there). It's at
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2452 by peterjef...@gmail.com: Problem with function evaluation
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2452
Please forgive any poor technique in reporting issues, I'm new to this
process (if you know of any
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 2452 by asmeurer: Problem with function evaluation
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2452
Well, I have some good news for you. This has all been fixed in the
development branch, and will be in the next release:
In [24]: f =
Updates:
Labels: Polynomial Simplify
Comment #2 on issue 2452 by asmeurer: Problem with function evaluation
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2452
Oh, and for what it's worth, your issue summary could have been better.
Something like apart((x**2 - 4*x -1)/((x - 1)**2 *
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2453 by austin.l...@gmail.com: abs(sympy.I * sympy.pi) evaluates
incorrectly
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2453
abs(sympy.I * sympy.pi)
I*pi
This clearly should just be pi.
Tested with git at
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Labels: WrongResult
Comment #1 on issue 2453 by asmeurer: abs(sympy.I * sympy.pi) evaluates
incorrectly
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2453
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are
Comment #2 on issue 2453 by asmeurer: abs(sympy.I * sympy.pi) evaluates
incorrectly
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2453
It works when the imaginary part is a Number, but apparently not when it is
some symbolic (but) real number:
In [3]: abs(I)
Out[3]: 1
In [4]: abs(I*2)
39 matches
Mail list logo