Re: Issue 2540 in sympy: log() not working properly

2011-07-02 Thread sympy
Comment #1 on issue 2540 by prashant...@gmail.com: log() not working properly http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2540 The above examples work if force=True argument is passed to the expand() function. log(x*y) log(x*y) log(x*y).expand(force=True) log(x) + log(y) But

Re: Issue 2540 in sympy: log() not working properly

2011-07-02 Thread sympy
Comment #2 on issue 2540 by prashant...@gmail.com: log() not working properly http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2540 In file sympy/functions/elementary/tests/test_exponential.py from line 143, the following assertions are made and AFAIK and seen, these assertions are meant

Re: Issue 2540 in sympy: log() not working properly

2011-07-02 Thread sympy
Comment #3 on issue 2540 by renato.c...@gmail.com: log() not working properly http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2540 The problem is that the separation is only valid if the symbols are positive. So this works: x, y = symbols('x y', positive=True) log(x*y).expand() log(x)

Re: Issue 1026 in sympy: pypy doesn't run sympy

2011-07-02 Thread sympy
Updates: Cc: vlada.pe...@gmail.com Comment #8 on issue 1026 by renato.c...@gmail.com: pypy doesn't run sympy http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1026 On master now (3c163b80), sympy is importable in pypy 1.5.0, and test('core') runs with only one (apparently trivial)

Issue 2541 in sympy: autowrap failing test

2011-07-02 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: renato.c...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High New issue 2541 by renato.c...@gmail.com: autowrap failing test http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2541 Testing master (4cb35185) in python2.7 gives the failure below. This doesn't happen in python2.7

Re: Issue 1026 in sympy: pypy doesn't run sympy

2011-07-02 Thread sympy
Updates: Owner: vlada.pe...@gmail.com Comment #9 on issue 1026 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: pypy doesn't run sympy http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1026 This is good news (thanks for the Cc, too)! As per my timeline, I'll focus on Python 3 support first (and the assorted

Re: Issue 1816 in sympy: Adding partial derivatives and taking derivatives with respect to functions

2011-07-02 Thread sympy
Updates: Cc: asmeurer Comment #4 on issue 1816 by elliso...@gmail.com: Adding partial derivatives and taking derivatives with respect to functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1816 I have implemented the _diff_wrt approach in my pull request. It appears to

Re: Issue 2540 in sympy: log() not working properly

2011-07-02 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #4 on issue 2540 by asmeurer: log() not working properly http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2540 Exactly. If you look right above that line in the test file, you can see that p and q are defined as p, q = symbols('p,q', positive=True) r

Re: Issue 2541 in sympy: autowrap failing test

2011-07-02 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: NeedsReview Comment #1 on issue 2541 by asmeurer: autowrap failing test http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2541 Yeah, this was pointed out before the release, and I thought I fixed it, but I guess I didn't. I didn't notice it because it only comes up if

Re: Issue 2541 in sympy: autowrap failing test

2011-07-02 Thread sympy
Comment #2 on issue 2541 by asmeurer: autowrap failing test http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2541 Yes, the commit was definitely there, but wasn't included in the merge commit. This must be a bug in GitHub. I'll notify them about it. -- You received this message because you

Re: Issue 1816 in sympy: Adding partial derivatives and taking derivatives with respect to functions

2011-07-02 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch Comment #5 on issue 1816 by asmeurer: Adding partial derivatives and taking derivatives with respect to functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1816 Tests and docs would be nice. So far, I get In [2]: diff(f(x),

Re: Issue 1816 in sympy: Adding partial derivatives and taking derivatives with respect to functions

2011-07-02 Thread sympy
Comment #6 on issue 1816 by asmeurer: Adding partial derivatives and taking derivatives with respect to functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1816 And this definitely needs to be fixed: In [7]: f(g(x)).diff(x) Out[7]: dd ─(f(g(x)))⋅──(g(x)) dg(x)

Re: Issue 1525 in sympy: No integration by substitution

2011-07-02 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #28 on issue 1525 by asmeurer: No integration by substitution http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1525 Yeah, I'd say it's fixed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post to this

Re: Issue 1816 in sympy: Adding partial derivatives and taking derivatives with respect to functions

2011-07-02 Thread sympy
Comment #7 on issue 1816 by elliso...@gmail.com: Adding partial derivatives and taking derivatives with respect to functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1816 In my funcderiv branch the following now work: In [2]: diff(f(x), x).diff(f(x)) Out[2]: 0 In [3]: (sin(f(x)) -