Re: Issue 1816 in sympy: Adding partial derivatives and taking derivatives with respect to functions

2011-07-15 Thread sympy
Comment #46 on issue 1816 by asmeurer: Adding partial derivatives and taking derivatives with respect to functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1816 This was also explained before, but let me explain again. diff can only take derivatives with respect to objects that have

Re: Issue 1575 in sympy: help(module) contains a bunch of irrelevant stuff

2011-07-15 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Low Comment #13 on issue 1575 by asmeurer: help(module) contains a bunch of irrelevant stuff http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1575 I'm not 100% sure that this is such a great idea anymore. -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 2537 in sympy: Use MathJax in the docs

2011-07-15 Thread sympy
Comment #13 on issue 2537 by asmeurer: Use MathJax in the docs http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2537 MathJax does not support bold math, so some \bm{\gamma} in the GA docs will not be able to work. I am going to just remove it. Perhaps it should be replaced with some kind of

Re: Issue 2537 in sympy: Use MathJax in the docs

2011-07-15 Thread sympy
Updates: Cc: abro...@verizon.net Comment #14 on issue 2537 by asmeurer: Use MathJax in the docs http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2537 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" gro

Re: Issue 2537 in sympy: Use MathJax in the docs

2011-07-15 Thread sympy
Comment #15 on issue 2537 by abro...@verizon.net: Use MathJax in the docs http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2537 Replacing bold vectors with arrows over the symbol is fine. There are also bold symbols with carets over them for unit vectors. Just unbold them and leave the carats.

Issue 2565 in sympy: Problem with Poly(modulus).is_irreducible

2011-07-15 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: asmeurer CC: matt...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Polynomial New issue 2565 by asmeurer: Problem with Poly(modulus).is_irreducible http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2565 In [1]: Poly(x**2 + x + 1, x, modulus=2).is_irreducible ---

Re: Issue 1816 in sympy: Adding partial derivatives and taking derivatives with respect to functions

2011-07-15 Thread sympy
Comment #47 on issue 1816 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Adding partial derivatives and taking derivatives with respect to functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1816 Yes, I know that the implementation uses ._diff_wrt, but the resulting behaviour appears completely arbitrary f

Re: Issue 2565 in sympy: Problem with Poly(modulus).is_irreducible

2011-07-15 Thread sympy
Comment #1 on issue 2565 by asmeurer: Problem with Poly(modulus).is_irreducible http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2565 Also: In [5]: Poly(x, x).is_irreducible --- AttributeError

Re: Issue 1816 in sympy: Adding partial derivatives and taking derivatives with respect to functions

2011-07-15 Thread sympy
Comment #48 on issue 1816 by asmeurer: Adding partial derivatives and taking derivatives with respect to functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1816 Or in concrete terms, why is it that diff(expr, cos(2*x)) works but diff(expr, 2*cos(x)) raises? Because cos(2*x) can una

Re: Issue 2537 in sympy: Use MathJax in the docs

2011-07-15 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: NeedsReview Comment #16 on issue 2537 by asmeurer: Use MathJax in the docs http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2537 See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/491. For now, I just made them normal symbols, since they look basically the same in the current doc

Re: Issue 2561 in sympy: Add a link to the source next to function definitions in the docs

2011-07-15 Thread sympy
Comment #4 on issue 2561 by asmeurer: Add a link to the source next to function definitions in the docs http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2561 This is fixed at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/491. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 2561 in sympy: Add a link to the source next to function definitions in the docs

2011-07-15 Thread sympy
Comment #3 on issue 2561 by asmeurer: Add a link to the source next to function definitions in the docs http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2561 This is fixed at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/491. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 1816 in sympy: Adding partial derivatives and taking derivatives with respect to functions

2011-07-15 Thread sympy
Comment #49 on issue 1816 by brad.froehle: Adding partial derivatives and taking derivatives with respect to functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1816 Because cos(2*x) can unambiguously be replaced in the original expression with the simple rule of "exact" substitution