Re: Issue 2589 in sympy: Implement tab completion in SymPy Live

Comment #11 on issue 2589 by elliso...@gmail.com: Implement tab completion in SymPy Live http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2589 Yes, tab already serves too many purposes in the browser: * Browser level focus shift between elements. * Indent. -- You received this message

Re: Issue 2589 in sympy: Implement tab completion in SymPy Live

Comment #12 on issue 2589 by asmeurer: Implement tab completion in SymPy Live http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2589 Hmm. Well, I think for Live we should have an option to use tab (we can also enable Control-Space). You should consider doing the same for IPython. -- You

Re: Issue 2607 in sympy: as_numer_denom() is too slow

Comment #3 on issue 2607 by asmeurer: as_numer_denom() is too slow http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2607 Well, my brain started hurting thinking about this, so I asked on stackoverflow:

Re: Issue 2607 in sympy: as_numer_denom() is too slow

Updates: Cc: smi...@gmail.com Comment #4 on issue 2607 by asmeurer: as_numer_denom() is too slow http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2607 OK, I've been avoiding dividing out each denominator term, as it seems like a bad idea (it basically amounts to combining exponents),

Re: Issue 2607 in sympy: as_numer_denom() is too slow

Comment #5 on issue 2607 by asmeurer: as_numer_denom() is too slow http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2607 It can happen. Here's a trivial example: In [13]: 2*(x + y)*z*(S(1)/2) Out[13]: z⋅(2⋅x + 2⋅y) ─ 2 I don't know if it can also happen besides the automatic

Re: Issue 2607 in sympy: as_numer_denom() is too slow

Comment #6 on issue 2607 by asmeurer: as_numer_denom() is too slow http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2607 Actually, I don't think as_numer_denom can make sense in the non-commutative case (we should check that it doesn't try to make sense of it). Because if you have a1*d1**-1

Issue 2608 in sympy: test_pickling errors under Python 3

Status: Accepted Owner: vlada.pe...@gmail.com CC: ronan.l...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Python3 New issue 2608 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: test_pickling errors under Python 3 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2608 test_pickling reports two errors when ran under

Issue 2609 in sympy: core/test_priority error under Python 3

Status: Accepted Owner: vlada.pe...@gmail.com CC: ronan.l...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Python3 New issue 2609 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: core/test_priority error under Python 3 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2609 There's an AssertionFail in test priority:

Issue 2610 in sympy: Wavefunction documentation errors under Python 3

Status: Accepted Owner: vlada.pe...@gmail.com CC: asmeurer Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Documentation Python3 New issue 2610 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: Wavefunction documentation errors under Python 3 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2610 It seems that some doctests

Re: Issue 2590 in sympy: jn_zeros in functions/special/bessel.py should return SymPy Floats, not Python floats

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #13 on issue 2590 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: jn_zeros in functions/special/bessel.py should return SymPy Floats, not Python floats http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2590 This is in now. As Ondrej said symbolic versions aren't too important,

Re: Issue 2611 in sympy: tensor/index_methods errors in Python 3

Updates: Cc: jensen.o...@gmail.com Comment #1 on issue 2611 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: tensor/index_methods errors in Python 3 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2611 Oyvind, hi, I know you haven't worked on SymPy much lately but as you wrote the tensor stuff perhaps

Issue 2612 in sympy: Error in quantum/__init__.py under Python 3

Status: Accepted Owner: vlada.pe...@gmail.com CC: elliso...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Quantum Python3 New issue 2612 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: Error in quantum/__init__.py under Python 3 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2612 There seems to be some import

Re: Issue 2536 in sympy: exp(-stuff) should be in the numerator

Updates: Status: fixed Mergedinto: Comment #3 on issue 2536 by smi...@gmail.com: exp(-stuff) should be in the numerator http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2536 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: Issue 2519 in sympy: latex((x + y)/exp(x)) is inconsistent with pretty-printer

Comment #4 on issue 2519 by smi...@gmail.com: latex((x + y)/exp(x)) is inconsistent with pretty-printer http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2519 Has this been fixed with the push of #477? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues

Re: Issue 2519 in sympy: latex((x + y)/exp(x)) is inconsistent with pretty-printer

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch PassedReview Comment #5 on issue 2519 by Vinzent.Steinberg: latex((x + y)/exp(x)) is inconsistent with pretty-printer http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2519 I think so, please reopen if not. -- You received this

Re: Issue 2608 in sympy: test_pickling errors under Python 3

Comment #1 on issue 2608 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: test_pickling errors under Python 3 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2608 The first one should be super easy to debug --- just print the matrices in return matrix_multiply(self,a), line 411. Whatis self and what is a?

Re: Issue 2610 in sympy: Wavefunction documentation errors under Python 3

Comment #1 on issue 2610 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: Wavefunction documentation errors under Python 3 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2610 I think this is purely how the numbers are printed using the repr, or doctest_repr printer (forgot the exact name). Apparently, this

Re: Issue 2611 in sympy: tensor/index_methods errors in Python 3

Comment #2 on issue 2611 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: tensor/index_methods errors in Python 3 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2611 The algorithm apparently sorts some dictionaries, that you can't do in python 3.0 anymore. So one would have to dig into the algorithm itself too

Re: Issue 2519 in sympy: latex((x + y)/exp(x)) is inconsistent with pretty-printer

Comment #6 on issue 2519 by asmeurer: latex((x + y)/exp(x)) is inconsistent with pretty-printer http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2519 Issue 2536 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group.