Re: Issue 2382 in sympy: Tuple needs ._to_mpmath

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 2382 by matt...@gmail.com: Tuple needs ._to_mpmath http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2382 This was fixed in c8639ab2d275e7b9641205b65b3e9f77b32cae56. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "s

Re: Issue 2626 in sympy: Piecewise should use a different syntax for "otherwise"

Comment #3 on issue 2626 by andy.ter...@gmail.com: Piecewise should use a different syntax for "otherwise" http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626 AFAIK we choose Mathematica's syntax I suggested a default keyword but it wasn't implemented. http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issu

Issue 2627 in sympy: factor breaks power rules

Status: Accepted Owner: smi...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2627 by smi...@gmail.com: factor breaks power rules http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2627 >>> sqrt(w/v) (w/v)**(1/2) >>> factor(_) w**(1/2)*(1/v)**(1/2) If w and v are -1 then s

Re: Issue 2626 in sympy: Piecewise should use a different syntax for "otherwise"

Comment #4 on issue 2626 by asmeurer: Piecewise should use a different syntax for "otherwise" http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626 It would work nice if we could use Python 3's keyword only arguments. Then we could do Piecewise(*args, otherwise=None). I actually prefer one

Re: Issue 2627 in sympy: factor breaks power rules

Updates: Labels: Assumptions Polynomial Comment #1 on issue 2627 by asmeurer: factor breaks power rules http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2627 This is happening in _symbolic_factor_list in polytools.py. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 2626 in sympy: Piecewise should use a different syntax for "otherwise"

Comment #5 on issue 2626 by matt...@gmail.com: Piecewise should use a different syntax for "otherwise" http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626 By the way, I'm not convinced that we need the ExprCondPair() object. I'm sure we don't. I don't remember what was first, Tuple or Exp

Re: Issue 2390 in sympy: factor(sqrt(x*y), expand=False) -> sqrt(x)*sqrt(y)

Comment #2 on issue 2390 by matt...@gmail.com: factor(sqrt(x*y), expand=False) -> sqrt(x)*sqrt(y) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2390 Issue 2627 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" grou

Re: Issue 2627 in sympy: factor breaks power rules

Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 2390 Comment #2 on issue 2627 by matt...@gmail.com: factor breaks power rules http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2627 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog

Re: Issue 2626 in sympy: Piecewise should use a different syntax for "otherwise"

Comment #6 on issue 2626 by asmeurer: Piecewise should use a different syntax for "otherwise" http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626 I don't think so. We shouldn't confuse Tuples with Vectors. Tuple was invented only for making args Basic. I think I agree. We should only eve

Re: Issue 2626 in sympy: Piecewise should use a different syntax for "otherwise"

Updates: Status: Started Comment #7 on issue 2626 by asmeurer: Piecewise should use a different syntax for "otherwise" http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626 I've started to fix this in my piecewise-syntax branch. I'll submit it as a pull request when it's all ready.