Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Parsing
New issue 2971 by asmeu...@gmail.com: MathML Parser
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2971
We should have a function that converts a mathml expression into a SymPy
object.
--
You received this
Comment #2 on issue 2969 by mario.pe...@gmail.com: sqrt(sin(x)).series(x,
0, 7) is wrong
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2969
p + O(x**7) means that p is equivalent to the sum of its monomials of order
less
than x**7, so that
```
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Labels: EasyToFix
Comment #1 on issue 2968 by asmeu...@gmail.com: partial fraction
decomposition should be able to return structured result
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2968
This would not be difficult, as the information is all
Comment #1 on issue 2971 by j...@durchholz.org: MathML Parser
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2971
The spec is at http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML3/ .
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to this group, send email
Comment #2 on issue 2960 by hunt...@gmail.com: It right 0 x 1 ?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2960
Hrm, I don't know if it'd helpful or wanted, and it ain't pretty (mostly
because it uses a global variable[1]), but attached is one possible method
to acquire a chained
Issue 1887: Separate boolean and symbolic relationals
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1887
This issue is now blocking issue 2960.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2960
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue,
Updates:
Blockedon: 1887
Comment #3 on issue 2960 by asmeu...@gmail.com: It right 0 x 1 ?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2960
I was thinking that something like this might be possible. Some potential
issues I see so far:
- It does require some kind of global
Comment #4 on issue 2960 by hunt...@gmail.com: It right 0 x 1 ?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2960
Hmm. In regards to the second bullet point, I have again some
2-minutes-of-thoughts options. (Apologies, I am focused elsewhere so I
can't do any deep thinking on this
Comment #5 on issue 2960 by asmeu...@gmail.com: It right 0 x 1 ?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2960
* Through the use of a second global (well, it needn't be a global, but
it must be some storage that is accessible and external to, in this case,
LT and test), I would
Comment #15 on issue 2587 by anxuiz...@gmail.com: Strange printing at SymPy
Live
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2587
After further investigation it appears that the assumptions for the two
exponents in x**2+x**-2 are pointing to the same object after pickling.
In [1]:
Comment #16 on issue 2587 by anxuiz...@gmail.com: Strange printing at SymPy
Live
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2587
According to the pickle documentation [0], equivalent objects are combined
and stored by reference instead of by value. This presents a problem in
our
Comment #17 on issue 2587 by anxuiz...@gmail.com: Strange printing at SymPy
Live
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2587
Looks like Pickler has a field fast for disabling the optimization. I
wrote a fast_dumps function and it appears to work:
In [1]: from pickle import
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Low
New issue 2972 by someb...@bluewin.ch: Autoevaluation of functions for
floats and complex floats
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2972
Consider the following list of numbers:
In [2]: vals = [2, 2.0, 2j, 2.0j, 2+2j,
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Physics Quantum
New issue 2973 by krastano...@gmail.com: raise an error on impossible spin
states in physics.quantum
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2973
JzKet(one/2,0) returns and is happily used by all the CG
Updates:
Labels: EasyToFix
Comment #1 on issue 2973 by krastano...@gmail.com: raise an error on
impossible spin states in physics.quantum
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2973
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are
Comment #2 on issue 2973 by krastano...@gmail.com: raise an error on
impossible spin states in physics.quantum
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2973
Spin states are supposed to have m (the second argument) in the set [-j,
-j+1, .. j] (j is the first argument)
--
You
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview
Comment #4 on issue 2759 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Implement the forumlas from
the matrix cookbook
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2759
That was merged.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
17 matches
Mail list logo