Comment #10 on issue 2863 by krastano...@gmail.com: Plotting failures with
SymPy-Bot
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2863
I have been able to reproduce it over ssh on another machine. I have not
done any bisecting to find why.
This does NOT produce the error:
In [2]:
Comment #11 on issue 2863 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Plotting failures with
SymPy-Bot
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2863
Well, that's not helpful:
import pyglet
pyglet.__version__
'$Id$'
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3025 by sean.v@gmail.com: Piecewise evaluate=False does not
work when conditions are boolean
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3025
Because bool's are not allowed in args, and without a Boolean
Issue 2531: Basic Boolean types (True, False, None)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2531
This issue is now blocking issue 3025.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3025
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue,
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #2 on issue 3007 by smi...@gmail.com: Mul.flatten should filter out
imaginary terms when oo is a factor
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3007
No, i*j might be (-3*I)*(2*I). The coefficient of the imaginary term may
have a sign as
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 3005 by smi...@gmail.com: exp(I*oo*x) gives nan
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3005
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 3003 by smi...@gmail.com: (-x*I*oo).coeff(I*oo) gives
None
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3003
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 3000 by smi...@gmail.com: Abs doesn't process more than
Rational from Mul arg
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3000
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 2998 by smi...@gmail.com: collect doesn't process
powers with float coeff in exponent
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2998
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 2997 by smi...@gmail.com: collect mishandles power rules
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2997
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 2996 by smi...@gmail.com: collect doesn't collect power
with numerical base
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2996
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 2990 by smi...@gmail.com: Float is not pulled out of
Mul base when exponent is Integer
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2990
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 2991 by smi...@gmail.com: commutative factors are not
pulled out of a Mul base
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2991
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 2988 by smi...@gmail.com: invalid expansion of Mul
bases in Pow
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2988
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #6 on issue 2061 by smi...@gmail.com: sqrt(-1.0*x) gives infinite
recursion
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2061
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #9 on issue 2878 by smi...@gmail.com: Add section to the Gotchas
about floating point numbers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2878
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #4 on issue 1707 by smi...@gmail.com: integrate(atan(x)**2, (x, -5,
5)).evalf() fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1707
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1021
integrate(atan(x)**2, (x, -5, 5)).evalf()
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3026 by sean.v@gmail.com: Latex printing test failure in
master
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3026
I found this failure in master from test_latex.py. This error comes up on
2.7, 2.5 and 3.2 in
Comment #1 on issue 3026 by sean.v@gmail.com: Latex printing test
failure in master
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3026
So looking at when things were committed and when Matthew's test was run,
the test came before the commit, so this is likely an issue for 64-bit
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #2 on issue 3026 by smi...@gmail.com: Latex printing test failure
in master
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3026
https://github.com/smichr/sympy/pull/new/3026
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Comment #17 on issue 1053 by smi...@gmail.com: make sympify intelligent
about 1/2 and 0.5
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1053
A way to choose battles you can win (with converting floats to Rationals)
is to convert only those that are exact in base 2: if m = log(n)/log(2)
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #1 on issue 1239 by smi...@gmail.com: decimals should be rationals
(!)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1239
with https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1013 this is now:
factor(x**2+Float('2.5')*x+1)
0.5*(1.0*x +
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #1 on issue 2340 by smi...@gmail.com: Real(1) returns Integer
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2340
Float(1) now returns 1.00 in
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1013
--
You received this message because you
Comment #18 on issue 1053 by smi...@gmail.com: make sympify intelligent
about 1/2 and 0.5
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1053
Sorry, that request is at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/998.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 3026 by smi...@gmail.com: Latex printing test failure
in master
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3026
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment #2 on issue 1239 by smi...@gmail.com: decimals should be rationals
(!)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1239
Sorry, that request is at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/998.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues
Comment #19 on issue 1053 by smi...@gmail.com: make sympify intelligent
about 1/2 and 0.5
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1053
(The math is wrong in comment 17, but the idea is right.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues
Comment #3 on issue 1239 by smi...@gmail.com: decimals should be rationals
(!)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1239
In the pull request I cite, Floats store the instantiation value in _raw,
so they could answer True for is_rational by seeing if _raw was a string or
28 matches
Mail list logo
