Comment #1 on issue 3059 by asmeu...@gmail.com: (x - oo).has(oo) is False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3059
It's for a similar reason that (-(x + 1)).has(x + 1) is False. I guess the
has docstring should be more explicit that the matching is exact
(structurally).
Is the
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Printing
New issue 3063 by asmeu...@gmail.com: set() does not pretty print correctly
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3063
In [52]: set([x**2])
Out[52]:
⎛ 2⎞
set⎝x ⎠
In [53]: set(x**2)
---
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Printing
New issue 3062 by asmeu...@gmail.com: set and frozenset are not printed
correctly with latex()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3062
In [45]: latex(set([x**2]))
Out[45]: set([x**2])
In [46]: latex(frozen
Comment #2 on issue 3052 by smi...@gmail.com: evaluating Abs should result
in a positive number
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3052
This is related to issue 3060 -- the use of evalf() to make decisions.
evalf() is also being used in the assumptions system to determine
pos
Status: Accepted
Owner: mrock...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low
New issue 3061 by mrock...@gmail.com: Stats sampling using numpy
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3061
The stats module has a sampling mechanism to provide approximate solutions
to statistical queri
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3060 by smi...@gmail.com: use of evalf() needs review
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3060
In numbers, there are many cases where evalf() is being used only to test
if something reduces to a Number. It
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3059 by smi...@gmail.com: (x - oo).has(oo) is False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3059
I understand the reason this fails but I think that maybe a note somewhere
(gotchas) about the fact that oo and -o
Comment #1 on issue 3052 by asmeu...@gmail.com: evaluating Abs should
result in a positive number
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3052
I'm not sure if this is fixable. Once you substitute in a number, abs
evaluates it:
In [30]: print e.subs(x,Rational('.1'))
-3.1415926535
Updates:
Cc: asmeu...@gmail.com
Comment #3 on issue 3053 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: setup.py egg-info fails
on Python3
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3053
Yeah, you need to do something like, tell Tox to run bin/use2to3, then
change to that directory, then run the te
Comment #2 on issue 3057 by ness...@gmail.com: Closed form results for
meijerg functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3057
Thank you for entering these. I will look through them during the next
weeks. (I'm in the middle of term though, so pretty busy.)
--
You received t
Updates:
Labels: Simplify
Comment #1 on issue 3057 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Closed form results for
meijerg functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3057
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
Updates:
Labels: Simplify
Comment #1 on issue 3056 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Closed-form results of sums
of meijerg functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3056
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
Updates:
Labels: Simplify
Comment #1 on issue 3055 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Simplification of bessel
functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3055
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"s
Updates:
Labels: Simplify
Comment #1 on issue 3054 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Simplification of ratios of
gamma functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3054
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3058 by waks...@gwax.com: solve cannot handle mixed trig functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3058
Trying to solve the equation:
2*sin(x) = cos(x)
By hand:
2*sin(x) = cos(x)
2*sin(x)/cos(x) = 1
sin(x)/c
Comment #3 on issue 2948 by waks...@gwax.com: solve cannot handle
polynomials of functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2948
This does not work for me in version 0.7.1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To p
Status: Accepted
Owner:
CC: ness...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3057 by someb...@bluewin.ch: Closed form results for meijerg
functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3057
We should do more closed form results for meijerg functions. When comput
Status: Accepted
Owner:
CC: ness...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3056 by someb...@bluewin.ch: Closed-form results of sums of
meijerg functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3056
Sometimes the sum of two or more meijerg functions should simplif
Status: Accepted
Owner:
CC: ness...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3055 by someb...@bluewin.ch: Simplification of bessel functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3055
Some simplifications for the Bessel functions are missing.
An example:
cosine_tr
Comment #2 on issue 3053 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: setup.py egg-info fails
on Python3
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3053
Yes, I used the defaults, except that I changed the envlist.
The bigger problem with this is that sympy cannot be pip-installed from
source on Python3.
Status: Accepted
Owner:
CC: ness...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3054 by someb...@bluewin.ch: Simplification of ratios of gamma
functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3054
Sympy can not simplify some rations of two gamma functions.
An example
Comment #1 on issue 3053 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: setup.py egg-info fails
on Python3
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3053
This is fine actually, 2to3 needs to be run on setup.py for it to be valid.
Did you edit your tox.ini file accordingly or did you just run it with the
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Critical Milestone-Release0.7.2 Python3
New issue 3053 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: setup.py egg-info fails on Python3
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3053
Tox log attached.
I guess that the trick is to make sure that setup.p
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #9 on issue 543 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: warnings on python
setup.py build
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=543
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/805 (cf. issue 2542) fixed the warnings.
--
You received this message because you are subs
Updates:
Labels: -PassedReview
Comment #42 on issue 1026 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: pypy doesn't run sympy
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1026
Hi, the Piecewise failure seems to have been fixed somewhere (either the
test was changed or PyPy can manage it now; regardless
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3052 by smi...@gmail.com: evaluating Abs should result in a
positive number
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3052
b=Float(str(int((pi*1e20).n(22
e = abs(b*(cos(x)**2+sin(x)**2)-b)
e.subs(x,Rational(
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview
Comment #8 on issue 2542 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: Compatibility with
py.test
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2542
Per Ronan in PR #805:
Known problems:
Tests having @slow and @XFAIL are reported incorrectly (this might be a
bug in
Comment #7 on issue 2542 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Compatibility with py.test
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2542
That was merged. Is there will work to do with this?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to thi
28 matches
Mail list logo
