Re: Issue 2109 in sympy: GA SymPy module not work embeded

2012-02-17 Thread sympy
Comment #1 on issue 2109 by christ...@cbuehler.de: GA SymPy module not work embeded http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2109 https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1066 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post to this

Issue 3082 in sympy: galgebra.GA duplicates sympy.var

2012-02-17 Thread sympy
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3082 by christ...@cbuehler.de: galgebra.GA duplicates sympy.var http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3082 in galgebra.GA, as far as I can see, the function make_symbols() does the same thing like

Issue 3083 in sympy: Not is still vectorized

2012-02-17 Thread sympy
Status: Started Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3083 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Not is still vectorized http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3083 Currently, we have: Not(True, False) [False, True] We removed Function vectorization in issue

Re: Issue 3083 in sympy: Not is still vectorized

2012-02-17 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: Logic Comment #1 on issue 3083 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Not is still vectorized http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3083 That's not even vectorization. That would be if Not([True False]) returned [False, True]. -- You received this message because you are

Re: Issue 1541 in sympy: Latex Print issue with printing min_, max_

2012-02-17 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 1541 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Latex Print issue with printing min_, max_ http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1541 This was merged. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group.

Issue 3084 in sympy: .expand() allows meaningless arguments

2012-02-17 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium EasyToFix New issue 3084 by asmeu...@gmail.com: .expand() allows meaningless arguments http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3084 In [105]: ((x + 1)*(x - 1)).expand() Out[105]: 2 x - 1 In [106]: ((x + 1)*(x -

Issue 3085 in sympy: poly() does not respect the given order of generators

2012-02-17 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Polynomial EasyToFix New issue 3085 by asmeu...@gmail.com: poly() does not respect the given order of generators http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3085 In [109]: Poly(x*y*z, y, z, x) Out[109]: Poly(y*z*x, y, z, x,

Re: Issue 2999 in sympy: expand(trig=True) could process Floats

2012-02-17 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: Simplify Comment #2 on issue 2999 by asmeu...@gmail.com: expand(trig=True) could process Floats http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2999 This is similar to factor(x**2.0 - 1) != (x**1.0 - 1)*(x**1.0 + 1) (that != means does not give). Mathematically,

Re: Issue 3002 in sympy: Error in textplot

2012-02-17 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Accepted Labels: Plotting Comment #1 on issue 3002 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Error in textplot http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3002 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 1722 in sympy: atomic mass unit (amu, u) is defined wrong

2012-02-17 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #7 on issue 1722 by asmeu...@gmail.com: atomic mass unit (amu, u) is defined wrong http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1722 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 2992 in sympy: in solve: check=False produces wrong answers

2012-02-17 Thread sympy
Comment #3 on issue 2992 by asmeu...@gmail.com: in solve: check=False produces wrong answers http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2992 I would separate it. check should only differentiate if it does checking on the solution or not. What you're advocating is to have it do more

Re: Issue 3004 in sympy: match gives nan when matching on oo

2012-02-17 Thread sympy
Comment #1 on issue 3004 by asmeu...@gmail.com: match gives nan when matching on oo http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3004 I guess we should remove terms without dividing. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post