Comment #7 on issue 1113 by abhishek...@gmail.com: rewrite sign(x) (and
possibly abs()) using Piecewise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1113
In [0]: integrate(abs(x),x)
Out[0]: 0
In [0]: integrate(abs(x),(x,-1,2))
Out[0]: 0
This problem is corrected for signum function but s
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #23 on issue 2956 by ness...@gmail.com: Simetimes the
test_hyperexpand.py (test_meijerg_shift_operators) fails in master.
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2956
You are right.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 3133 by smi...@gmail.com: e.evalf(1) does not mean
evaluate to 1 decimal place
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3133
Thanks, Aaron, for looking this over. This is in.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 3022 by smi...@gmail.com: maximum recursion depth
exceeded with expand(complex=True)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3022
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to th
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview -smichr Simplify
Comment #4 on issue 3058 by smi...@gmail.com: solve cannot handle mixed
trig functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3058
This is a simplification issue. Although the solver can return simpler
solutions, these are regr
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 3024 by smi...@gmail.com: simplify() doesn't work
without extra factor
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3024
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #5 on issue 1809 by smi...@gmail.com: extract_additively should aim
for 0
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1809
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy
Updates:
Blockedon: 1941
Comment #1 on issue 3121 by asmeu...@gmail.com: warning MatMul is a
pseudo-Mul
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3121
I think the only way to really fix this is to eliminate MatMul and make it
so that MatrixSymbols can be used inside a regular
Issue 1941: Objects that know how to combine themselves
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1941
This issue is now blocking issue 3121.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3121
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue