Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3138 by smi...@gmail.com: polys expanded representation problem
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3138
There is something a little strange about the expanded representation of
the following after replacing
Comment #2 on issue 2970 by snktagar...@gmail.com: coverage_doctest.py
should report public classes (not just functions)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2970
There is an issue with the existing doctest coverage tool itself. The check
to find "def" and correspondingly continu
Updates:
Status: Started
Labels: -Type-Defect -Priority-Medium Type-Enhancement Priority-Low
Comment #7 on issue 2528 by unlimite...@gmail.com: Update SymPy's Wikipedia
article
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2528
The SymPy Wikipedia page has got a lot better n
Comment #8 on issue 2528 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Update SymPy's Wikipedia
article
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2528
Awesome. Wikipedia is a starting point for information about anything
these days, so having a good article is definitely a worthy thing.
Be sure to includ
Updates:
Labels: WrongResult Polynomial
Comment #1 on issue 3138 by asmeu...@gmail.com: polys expanded
representation problem
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3138
The reason you have 2**2 is that the poly printer isn't smart enough to put
parentheses around an Add ge
Comment #2 on issue 3138 by asmeu...@gmail.com: polys expanded
representation problem
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3138
Also, there are functions in the polys that can efficiently do a shift,
which should be used here as well (rather than a naive expansion).
--
You rece
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3139 by benv...@gmail.com: Plotting issue
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3139
I am running sympy version 0.7.1 with python 2.6 on OSX 10.5.8 and whenever
I plot something, the plot window comes up with the g
Comment #3 on issue 3138 by smi...@gmail.com: polys expanded representation
problem
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3138
But what is showing up in the printed form is wrong:
>>> -y + 2**2 + 2*-y + 2*y + y**2 - 4
y**2 - y
That should be zero. The "as_expr" form is rig
Updates:
Labels: WrongResult
Comment #1 on issue 3038 by asmeu...@gmail.com: sign change in evalf of
complex value as precision is increased
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3038
I get the same thing, except the other roots change sign:
In [18]: for i in range(1,10):
Comment #4 on issue 2867 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Calls to raises() should
use lambda
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2867
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/911
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this
Comment #4 on issue 3138 by asmeu...@gmail.com: polys expanded
representation problem
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3138
No, it's just missing parentheses. It's just a naive printing error because
it doesn't expect to need to add them.
For example, the first part, -y + 2
Comment #5 on issue 3138 by smi...@gmail.com: polys expanded representation
problem
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3138
ahh...an algebraic tanagram of sorts. Thanks. I couldn't see it before.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"symp
Status: Accepted
Owner:
CC: krastano...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Matrices
New issue 3140 by mrock...@gmail.com: Calling Matrix on a MatrixExpr should
produce a Matrix
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3140
Currently to convert from a matrix expression w
Comment #16 on issue 309 by asmeu...@gmail.com: plotting on macos x freezes
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=309
Issue 3139 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group,
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Labels: Plotting
Mergedinto: 309
Comment #1 on issue 3139 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Plotting issue
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3139
Yeah, this is a known issue with Pyglet. See issue 309. I think the
problem is with Pyglet (
Comment #1 on issue 3140 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Calling Matrix on a
MatrixExpr should produce a Matrix
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3140
Imho, that should just evaluate by default.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues"
Comment #3 on issue 3040 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Problem with simplify()
with an expression with O()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3040
Oh, you're right, that should have been alpha3. I hope I ended up fixing
that in the end.
--
You received this message because you are
Updates:
Labels: EasyToFix
Comment #2 on issue 2977 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Tuple should introspect
better on sorting
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2977
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr
18 matches
Mail list logo
