Re: Issue 3140 in sympy: Calling Matrix on a MatrixExpr should produce a Matrix

Comment #1 on issue 3140 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Calling Matrix on a MatrixExpr should produce a Matrix http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3140 Imho, that should just evaluate by default. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues

Re: Issue 3040 in sympy: Problem with simplify() with an expression with O()

Comment #3 on issue 3040 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Problem with simplify() with an expression with O() http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3040 Oh, you're right, that should have been alpha3. I hope I ended up fixing that in the end. -- You received this message because you are

Re: Issue 2977 in sympy: Tuple should introspect better on sorting

Updates: Labels: EasyToFix Comment #2 on issue 2977 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Tuple should introspect better on sorting http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2977 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Issue 3141 in sympy: issue with the plotting capabilities in windows 7 32 64 bit

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3141 by luca@gmail.com: issue with the plotting capabilities in windows 7 32 64 bit http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3141 I use python 2.7.2 ans sympy 0.7.1. I have tryed to use the plotting

Re: Issue 2219 in sympy: Arbitrary constants in indefinite integration

Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch Comment #12 on issue 2219 by smi...@gmail.com: Arbitrary constants in indefinite integration http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2219 The closed pull request is at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/201 . -- You received

Re: Issue 978 in sympy: extract (-1) from all expressions canonically

Comment #8 on issue 978 by smi...@gmail.com: extract (-1) from all expressions canonically http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=978 The sign simplification referred to above should have used the following: z.subs([(a, Mul(-1, -a, evaluate=False)) for a in z.atoms(Add) if

Re: Issue 3129 in sympy: Drastic change to sympy.stats: Adding concept of Probability Distributions on surface level

Comment #6 on issue 3129 by nathan.f...@gmail.com: Drastic change to sympy.stats: Adding concept of Probability Distributions on surface level http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3129 Aaron, which notation would you prefer? X = Binomial(2, 0.5, 'X') (what's currently offered) X

Re: Issue 3129 in sympy: Drastic change to sympy.stats: Adding concept of Probability Distributions on surface level

Comment #8 on issue 3129 by nathan.f...@gmail.com: Drastic change to sympy.stats: Adding concept of Probability Distributions on surface level http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3129 Ah, I see. Is there any way/reason for the *user* to see the interior variable? I've run into

Re: Issue 3123 in sympy: Naming conventions in sympy/stats/

Comment #4 on issue 3123 by mrock...@gmail.com: Naming conventions in sympy/stats/ http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3123 For me making code look like math is a high priority. E and P are the standard ways to represent expectation and probability and so I'll back them to

Re: Issue 3129 in sympy: Drastic change to sympy.stats: Adding concept of Probability Distributions on surface level

Comment #9 on issue 3129 by mrock...@gmail.com: Drastic change to sympy.stats: Adding concept of Probability Distributions on surface level http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3129 Both T and T_posterior have a link to their internal symbol. In [6]: T.symbol is Symbol('T')

Re: Issue 2896 in sympy: Have coverage_doctest.py check if the docstring is imported into Sphinx

Comment #3 on issue 2896 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Have coverage_doctest.py check if the docstring is imported into Sphinx http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2896 Issue 3075 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 3075 in sympy: coverage_doctest.py should check if doctests are imported into Sphinx

Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 2896 Comment #1 on issue 3075 by asmeu...@gmail.com: coverage_doctest.py should check if doctests are imported into Sphinx http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3075 Turns out I did create this issue :) -- You received this

Re: Issue 3040 in sympy: Problem with simplify() with an expression with O()

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #4 on issue 3040 by smi...@gmail.com: Problem with simplify() with an expression with O() http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3040 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Issue 2025 in sympy: should separate and separatevars work harder?

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 2025 by smi...@gmail.com: should separate and separatevars work harder? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2025 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 1811 in sympy: separatevars modifications

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #5 on issue 1811 by smi...@gmail.com: separatevars modifications http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1811 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues

Re: Issue 1709 in sympy: separatevars fails if given an expression with noncommutative symbols

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #8 on issue 1709 by smi...@gmail.com: separatevars fails if given an expression with noncommutative symbols http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1709 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are

Re: Issue 642 in sympy: wrong answer from simplifying non-commutative symbols

Updates: Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch -smichr Comment #10 on issue 642 by smi...@gmail.com: wrong answer from simplifying non-commutative symbols http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=642 factor is now nc-aware. collect has not been fixed. coeff appears to be broken since