Comment #1 on issue 2856 by amake...@college.harvard.edu: lim x^8/(x^8+1)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2856
This seems to work now (0.7.1) with 8, and also with numbers up to but not
including 16. All larger numbers seem to lead to the same prompt as above.
I'll try to tra
Updates:
Summary: limit(x**16/(x**16 + 1), x, oo) fails
Status: Accepted
Labels: Series
Comment #2 on issue 2856 by asmeu...@gmail.com: limit(x**16/(x**16 + 1), x,
oo) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2856
Apparently there's a hard-coded limit for
Comment #1 on issue 2328 by gaurav.s...@gmail.com: expand() doesn't parse
bad hints correctly
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2328
Hi Aaron, I tried to fix this bug and have sent a pull request
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1117
--
You received this message becaus
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3142 by mario.pe...@gmail.com: recursion error in sqrtdenest
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3142
```
from sympy import *
sqrtdenest(sqrt( -320 + 32*sqrt(5) + 64*sqrt(15)))
...
RuntimeError: maximum re
Comment #1 on issue 3142 by mario.pe...@gmail.com: recursion error in
sqrtdenest
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3142
Fixed in https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1118
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post
Comment #2 on issue 3142 by mario.pe...@gmail.com: recursion error in
sqrtdenest
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3142
Fixed in https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1119
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview Simplify
Comment #3 on issue 3142 by asmeu...@gmail.com: recursion error in
sqrtdenest
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3142
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
Status: Accepted
Owner:
CC: mrock...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium WrongResult Matrices
New issue 3143 by krastano...@gmail.com: Multiplication of immutable
matrices gives wrong results on specific input
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3143
In [112]: Immu
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: mrock...@gmail.com
Comment #1 on issue 3143 by mrock...@gmail.com: Multiplication of immutable
matrices gives wrong results on specific input
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3143
See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1120
--
Y
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #2 on issue 3143 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Multiplication of immutable
matrices gives wrong results on specific input
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3143
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because
Comment #8 on issue 1113 by asmeu...@gmail.com: rewrite sign(x) (and
possibly abs()) using Piecewise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1113
In master both remain unevaluated:
In [1]: integrate(abs(x), x)Out[1]:
⌠
⎮ │x│ dx
⌡
In [2]: integrate(abs(x), (x, -1, 2))Out[2]:
2
⌠
⎮
Comment #1 on issue 3060 by asmeu...@gmail.com: use of evalf() needs review
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3060
Wouldn't it be easier to just check if free_symbols is empty in that case?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #3 on issue 3044 by asmeu...@gmail.com: qapply does not work for
c_part*TensorProduct
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3044
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
Comment #6 on issue 3073 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Ordering args in Adds when
printing to move negative signs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3073
Maple just keeps things in the order you enter them, and output from
functions is customized (e.g., the series function returns exp
Comment #7 on issue 3073 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Ordering args in Adds when
printing to move negative signs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3073
I just checked, and the TI89 is not as smart as I remember it. I think we
can improve upon it. It does turn -x + y into y - x, an
Comment #10 on issue 3129 by nathan.f...@gmail.com: Drastic change to
sympy.stats: Adding concept of Probability Distributions on surface level
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3129
Okay then... why do PSpaces need a symbol bound to them? Printing out
pspace(X) gives us a dom
Comment #11 on issue 3129 by mrock...@gmail.com: Drastic change to
sympy.stats: Adding concept of Probability Distributions on surface level
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3129
In general PSpaces can have a many symbols bound to them. They act as
indices into the distributi
Comment #12 on issue 3129 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Drastic change to
sympy.stats: Adding concept of Probability Distributions on surface level
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3129
In [1]: from sympy.stats import *
In [2]: T = Normal(30, 3, symbol=Symbol('T')) # temperature is 3
Comment #13 on issue 3129 by mrock...@gmail.com: Drastic change to
sympy.stats: Adding concept of Probability Distributions on surface level
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3129
T and T_posterior represent the same variable in different contexts. It
doesn't make sense to com
19 matches
Mail list logo
