Re: Issue 3207 in sympy: Wrong results with factor and noncommutative functions

2012-04-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3207 by smi...@gmail.com: Wrong results with factor and noncommutative functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3207 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Issue 3222 in sympy: Memory problems with the cache

2012-04-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Summary: Memory problems with the cache Status: Valid Comment #3 on issue 3222 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Memory problems with the cache http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3222 Great. Like I said, you'll probably want to use judicious calls to

Re: Issue 2856 in sympy: limit(x**16/(x**16 + 1), x, oo) fails

2012-04-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #4 on issue 2856 by smi...@gmail.com: limit(x**16/(x**16 + 1), x, oo) fails http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2856 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 2856 in sympy: limit(x**16/(x**16 + 1), x, oo) fails

2012-04-13 Thread sympy
Comment #5 on issue 2856 by smi...@gmail.com: limit(x**16/(x**16 + 1), x, oo) fails http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2856 This ended up being a bit of a marathon repair, but such expressions work nicely (and quickly). A big thanks to @tsndiffopera who got this going,

Re: Issue 2856 in sympy: limit(x**16/(x**16 + 1), x, oo) fails

2012-04-13 Thread sympy
Comment #6 on issue 2856 by asmeu...@gmail.com: limit(x**16/(x**16 + 1), x, oo) fails http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2856 For reference, the pull request was https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1215 and https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1225. -- You received this

Issue 3223 in sympy: degree((x+1)**10000) takes too long

2012-04-13 Thread sympy
Status: Valid Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Polynomial New issue 3223 by asmeu...@gmail.com: degree((x+1)**1) takes too long http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3223 degree() should be able to return almost instantly, but something like degree((x+1)**1)

Re: Issue 3223 in sympy: degree((x+1)**10000) takes too long

2012-04-13 Thread sympy
Comment #1 on issue 3223 by smi...@gmail.com: degree((x+1)**1) takes too long http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3223 as_leading_term is your workhorse: eq=(x+1)**1 eq.as_leading_term(x) 1 eq.subs(x,1/x).as_leading_term(x).subs(x, 1/x) x**1

Re: Issue 3223 in sympy: degree((x+1)**10000) takes too long

2012-04-13 Thread sympy
Comment #2 on issue 3223 by smi...@gmail.com: degree((x+1)**1) takes too long http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3223 But watch out if it's not a polynomial: -(exp(x)).subs(x, 1/x).leadterm(x)[0] Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module File

Issue 3224 in sympy: Generating Functions for sympy.stats

2012-04-13 Thread sympy
Status: Valid Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Statistics New issue 3224 by mrock...@gmail.com: Generating Functions for sympy.stats http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3224 Is there any benefit to reasoning about generating functions (moment, cumulant, etc...)

Re: Issue 3224 in sympy: Generating Functions for sympy.stats

2012-04-13 Thread sympy
Comment #1 on issue 3224 by mrock...@gmail.com: Generating Functions for sympy.stats http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3224 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability-generating_function http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Characteristic_function_(probability_theory) -- You received

Re: Issue 2881 in sympy: Refactory secondquant to use new quantum modules

2012-04-13 Thread sympy
Comment #2 on issue 2881 by sean.v@gmail.com: Refactory secondquant to use new quantum modules http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2881 I pulled the book referenced in secondquant from my library and I started playing with this a little. I was at least able to get bosons

Re: Issue 3186 in sympy: pprint evaluates unevaluaed denominator

2012-04-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #4 on issue 3186 by smi...@gmail.com: pprint evaluates unevaluaed denominator http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3186 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Issue 3225 in sympy: pprint evaluates unevaluated denominator

2012-04-13 Thread sympy
Status: Valid Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3225 by smi...@gmail.com: pprint evaluates unevaluated denominator http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3225 x = Pow(2, 3, evaluate=False) y = Pow(10, -2, evaluate=False) Mul(x, y, evaluate=False) 2**3/10**2