Re: Issue 391 in sympy: naming for subclasses of Function ?

Updates: Status: WontFix Comment #23 on issue 391 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: naming for subclasses of Function ? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=391 Our conventions work fine and any change would be disruptive, so I agree that we should leave things as they are. --

Re: Issue 366 in sympy: Interactive plotting with pygame

Updates: Status: WontFix Comment #3 on issue 366 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Interactive plotting with pygame http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=366 Current thinking is that plotting should be handled by matplotlib, so we won't use pygame and we won't extend the current

Re: Issue 454 in sympy: __lt__ should work in the pythonic way

Updates: Status: WontFix Comment #6 on issue 454 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: __lt__ should work in the pythonic way http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=454 We've settled on x y returning x y and I don't think that'll change. -- You received this message because you are

Re: Issue 366 in sympy: Interactive plotting with pygame

Updates: Cc: krastano...@gmail.com Comment #4 on issue 366 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Interactive plotting with pygame http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=366 Actually current thinking is at plotting should be backend agnostic, with a main focus on matplotlib, so Pharos

Re: Issue 366 in sympy: Interactive plotting with pygame

Comment #5 on issue 366 by krastano...@gmail.com: Interactive plotting with pygame http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=366 Making this a backend for the plotting module is possible. However WontFix seems appropriate as I doubt that there will be much interest in this option

Re: Issue 684 in sympy: speed: Rational is slow

Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #2 on issue 684 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: speed: Rational is slow http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=684 It's unclear what the issue was here. I doubt it's still relevant. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 1516 in sympy: exp.as_leading_term returns wrong results

Updates: Status: Valid Labels: WrongResult Core Comment #1 on issue 1516 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: exp.as_leading_term returns wrong results http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1516 This is still valid. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: Issue 588 in sympy: simplify should be better at detecting repeated factors

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #11 on issue 588 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: simplify should be better at detecting repeated factors http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=588 It seems that this has been fixed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Issue 3268 in sympy: simplify fails to recognize a zero

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #4 on issue 3268 by smi...@gmail.com: simplify fails to recognize a zero http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3268 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Issue 3271 in sympy: simplify doesn't handle expressions like 2**(2*x+2)/4 well

Status: Valid Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3271 by smi...@gmail.com: simplify doesn't handle expressions like 2**(2*x+2)/4 well http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3271 Somewhere in simplify, expression that contain numerical terms that are combined