Re: Issue 3381 in sympy: Remove deprecated zeros([r, c]) and ones([r, c]) syntax

Comment #7 on issue 3381 by smi...@gmail.com: Remove deprecated zeros([r, c]) and ones([r, c]) syntax http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3381 See issue 884 for the other matrix/sympy/numpy issues which is a WontFix. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Issue 771 in sympy: Matrix equations

Comment #6 on issue 771 by julien.r...@gmail.com: Matrix equations http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=771 Using ImmutableMatrix gets you pass the sympify error but the solver returns an empty solution. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 1491 in sympy: Remove old printing ordering at some point

Updates: Labels: DeprecationRemoval Comment #48 on issue 1491 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Remove old printing ordering at some point http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1491 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to th

Re: Issue 1884 in sympy: remove old assumptions

Issue 1884: remove old assumptions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884 This issue is now blocking issue sympy:1941. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1941 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because yo

Re: Issue 1941 in sympy: Objects that know how to combine themselves

Updates: Labels: -DeprecationRemoval Blockedon: -sympy:1884 -sympy:1908 sympy:1884 sympy:1908 Comment #12 on issue 1941 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Objects that know how to combine themselves http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1941 Oops. That should be issue 1491. --

Re: Issue 1884 in sympy: remove old assumptions

Issue 1884: remove old assumptions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884 This issue is now blocking issue sympy:1941. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1941 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because yo

Re: Issue 1908 in sympy: more efficient core

Issue 1908: more efficient core http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908 This issue is now blocking issue sympy:1941. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1941 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you s

Re: Issue 1908 in sympy: more efficient core

Issue 1908: more efficient core http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908 This issue is now blocking issue sympy:1941. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1941 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you s

Re: Issue 3386 in sympy: Remove old statistics module in favor of the new stats module

Comment #3 on issue 3386 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Remove old statistics module in favor of the new stats module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3386 People should also look at http://docs.sympy.org/dev/modules/stats.html to get an idea of what is possible in the new module. I

Re: Issue 3381 in sympy: Remove deprecated zeros([r, c]) and ones([r, c]) syntax

Comment #6 on issue 3381 by smi...@gmail.com: Remove deprecated zeros([r, c]) and ones([r, c]) syntax http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3381 I think it had to do with the fact that anything else that needs a dimension doesn't have to enter that dimension in a list. And you a

Re: Issue 3383 in sympy: Remove deprecated separate() function

Comment #1 on issue 3383 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Remove deprecated separate() function http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3383 One caveat: in separate, deep was False by default; in expand_power_base, deep is True by default. Note however that before the refactoring of expand

Re: Issue 2389 in sympy: Remove deprecated __contains__ methods

Updates: Labels: -PassedReview Core Comment #15 on issue 2389 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Remove deprecated __contains__ methods http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2389 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go

Re: Issue 3378 in sympy: Remove deprecated Symbol(dummy=True) syntax

Comment #2 on issue 3378 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Remove deprecated Symbol(dummy=True) syntax http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3378 For symbols, var, and numbered_symbols, use cls=Dummy. This was changed to make the constructor cleaner (Symbol() now only creates Symbols), and

Re: Issue 3377 in sympy: Remove deprecated as_coeff_terms and as_coeff_factors

Comment #2 on issue 3377 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Remove deprecated as_coeff_terms and as_coeff_factors http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3377 The reason for the change is that the function names are now much more descriptive (it is clear what class the constant is being removed

Re: Issue 2283 in sympy: Remove Basic.__contains__

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -DeprecationRemoval Comment #22 on issue 2283 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Remove Basic.__contains__ http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2283 Ah, I guess issue 2389 is actually the correct issue for this. -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 2389 in sympy: Remove deprecated __contains__ methods

Updates: Labels: DeprecationRemoval Comment #14 on issue 2389 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Remove deprecated __contains__ methods http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2389 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go

Re: Issue 3381 in sympy: Remove deprecated zeros([r, c]) and ones([r, c]) syntax

Comment #5 on issue 3381 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Remove deprecated zeros([r, c]) and ones([r, c]) syntax http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3381 So clearly these deprecation issues should explain why the feature was deprecated. I'll try to go through the other ones and explain

Re: Issue 3381 in sympy: Remove deprecated zeros([r, c]) and ones([r, c]) syntax

Updates: Cc: smi...@gmail.com Comment #4 on issue 3381 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Remove deprecated zeros([r, c]) and ones([r, c]) syntax http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3381 Chris, do you remember the reason for doing this? Maybe it has something to do with the fact that

Re: Issue 3381 in sympy: Remove deprecated zeros([r, c]) and ones([r, c]) syntax

Updates: Labels: Matrices Comment #3 on issue 3381 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Remove deprecated zeros([r, c]) and ones([r, c]) syntax http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3381 I found this pull request from a year ago: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/581. There is no di

Re: Issue 3180 in sympy: Evaluate expressions containing ImmutableMatrix by default

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -NeedsReview Comment #6 on issue 3180 by mrock...@gmail.com: Evaluate expressions containing ImmutableMatrix by default http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3180 This PR was merged. Closing this issue. -- You received this message bec

Re: Issue 771 in sympy: Matrix equations

Comment #5 on issue 771 by mrock...@gmail.com: Matrix equations http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=771 Could this work if A,B,C were ImmutableMatrices? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" group. To post to this group, send em

Re: Issue 3381 in sympy: Remove deprecated zeros([r, c]) and ones([r, c]) syntax

Comment #2 on issue 3381 by mrock...@gmail.com: Remove deprecated zeros([r, c]) and ones([r, c]) syntax http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3381 Should this be deprecated? This breaks with the numpy API from numpy import ones ones(1,2) TypeError: data type not unders

Re: Issue 3371 in sympy: Order() should implement a conjugate method

Comment #6 on issue 3371 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Order() should implement a conjugate method http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3371 I imagine for complex variables the order would be defined using absolute value, in which case conjugation should be ignored. I think I've seen

Re: Issue 3371 in sympy: Order() should implement a conjugate method

Comment #5 on issue 3371 by julien.r...@gmail.com: Order() should implement a conjugate method http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3371 In discussion on the first PR, we don't know what Order(x) for a complex x would mean mathematically. It's important to know that my initial is

2 issues changed in sympy

Updates: Status: Started Owner: julien.r...@gmail.com Labels: NeedsReview Comment by julien.r...@gmail.com: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1516 Affected issues: issue 3370: Order() does not work with noncommutative symbol http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/d

Re: Issue 3369 in sympy: Simple trigonometric simplification and noncommutative symbol

Updates: Status: Started Comment #2 on issue 3369 by julien.r...@gmail.com: Simple trigonometric simplification and noncommutative symbol http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3369 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscr

Re: Issue 3369 in sympy: Simple trigonometric simplification and noncommutative symbol

Updates: Owner: julien.r...@gmail.com Labels: NeedsReview Comment #1 on issue 3369 by julien.r...@gmail.com: Simple trigonometric simplification and noncommutative symbol http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3369 https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1515 -- You rece

Re: Issue 3367 in sympy: crv_types failure in master (randomization?)

Comment #8 on issue 3367 by smi...@gmail.com: crv_types failure in master (randomization?) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3367 Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" group. To post to this group, send email to sym

Re: Issue 3367 in sympy: crv_types failure in master (randomization?)

Updates: Owner: julien.r...@gmail.com Cc: -julien.r...@gmail.com Labels: -NeedsReview Comment #7 on issue 3367 by julien.r...@gmail.com: crv_types failure in master (randomization?) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3367 I confirm that this has been fixed