Comment #4 on issue 3447 by mrock...@gmail.com: Elementwise product for
Matrix Expressions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3447
Any suggestions on syntax for the public interface? We don't have MatLab's
`.*`
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Comment #5 on issue 3447 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Elementwise product for
Matrix Expressions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3447
Probably we should just use A.hadamard(B) (that is what it's called in
regular matrices, right?). If you want special syntax, you should go fight
Updates:
Labels: -CodeInImportedIntoMelange
Blockedon: -sympy:1598 sympy:1598
Blockedon: -sympy:1980 -sympy:2114 sympy:1980 sympy:2114
Blocking: -sympy:1336 -sympy:3121 sympy:1336 sympy:3121
Blocking: -sympy:1788 sympy:1788
Blockedon: -sympy:2874
Status: Valid
Owner:
CC: fred...@witherden.org
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3449 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Autowrap ((x - y)**25).expand() is a
bad example
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3449
This was originally https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/1593.
Updates:
Cc: -ondrej.c...@gmail.com
Comment #58 on issue 1047 by mrock...@gmail.com: Suggested new assumption
system
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1047
What about creating a standard object that contains a Basic and a set of
applied predicates? I like the idea of
Status: Valid
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Assumptions
New issue 3450 by mrock...@gmail.com: compute_known_facts requires
copy-paste
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3450
In assumptions the compute_known_facts function looks at some non-local
variables and
