Status: Valid
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Solvers
New issue 3545 by asmeu...@gmail.com: solving a complicated expression with
square roots
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3545
From http://colabti.org/irclogger/irclogger_log/sympy?date=2012-12-02
09:05 R0b0
Comment #1 on issue 3545 by asmeu...@gmail.com: solving a complicated
expression with square roots
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3545
So the issue here is
1. Can we get solve() to return something simpler?
2. solve() just hangs unless you call it with simplify=False and
Comment #2 on issue 3545 by asmeu...@gmail.com: solving a complicated
expression with square roots
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3545
I missed the last part of the pastebin:
The reflection of f over g is then given in parameterized form as
x(m) = q
y(m) = p(
Status: Valid
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3546 by smi...@gmail.com: 0*x
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3546
0*x
0
0*oo
nan
The x and all factors for which is_finite is not True should be retained in
a product so that a proper determination of
Comment #1 on issue 3546 by asmeu...@gmail.com: 0*x
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3546
I think this was discussed before. If 0*x remained unevaluated, then
nothing would work like you want it to. x - x would not go to 0. Try
making the change in the core and seeing how ma
Status: Valid
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3547 by smi...@gmail.com: Undefined functions with number
arguments should have is_number be False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3547
Function('f')(1).is_number
True
Perhaps it would be better to have
