Updates:
Labels: smichr NeedsReview
Comment #5 on issue 3117 by smi...@gmail.com: -+inf with pretty printer and
Float('inf')
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3117
In PR 1680 it now prints as
pprint(log(-1e1000))
∞ + ⅈ⋅π
--
You received this message because you are
Comment #6 on issue 3117 by smi...@gmail.com: -+inf with pretty printer and
Float('inf')
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3117
Sorry...make that just oo
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to this group,
Comment #1 on issue 3547 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Undefined functions with
number arguments should have is_number be False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3547
But our assumptions on Function mean it is a number, even if we don't know
what that number is.
Regarding solve, I
Comment #7 on issue 3117 by asmeu...@gmail.com: -+inf with pretty printer
and Float('inf')
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3117
It should still print as inf, to differentiate it from symbolic infinity.
And oo + I*pi should not reduce to oo.
--
You received this message
Comment #8 on issue 3117 by smi...@gmail.com: -+inf with pretty printer and
Float('inf')
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3117
What's the difference between symbolic and floating infinity? This is
really strange to have SymPy dealing with two types of infinity. And the
Comment #9 on issue 3117 by asmeu...@gmail.com: -+inf with pretty printer
and Float('inf')
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3117
Other than calling different mechanisms, which can lead to different
answers (c.f. log(-oo) vs. log(-inf)), I'm not sure. Maybe it's that
Comment #2 on issue 3547 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Undefined functions with
number arguments should have is_number be False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3547
If we don't know what it is, then we can't evalf() it or compare it to a
real real number, which means that
Comment #3 on issue 3547 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Undefined functions with
number arguments should have is_number be False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3547
I guess it's fine if defining is_number that way makes it more useful. This
again goes back to issue 2916.
--
You
Updates:
Labels: Assumptions
Comment #4 on issue 3547 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Undefined functions with
number arguments should have is_number be False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3547
Make that issue 2196.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Updates:
Blockedon: sympy:2196
Comment #5 on issue 3547 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Undefined functions with
number arguments should have is_number be False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3547
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because
Issue 2196: Document assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2196
This issue is now blocking issue sympy:3547.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3547
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you
Comment #1 on issue 3520 by notruper...@gmail.com: Identify and fix broken
links in the docs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3520
I am currently looking into this one, as an opportunity to learn Sphinx.
What is the preferred way of providing my corrections?
Should I
Comment #2 on issue 3520 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Identify and fix broken
links in the docs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3520
Please submit a pull request.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to this
13 matches
Mail list logo
