Issue 3638 in sympy: Automatic series expansion while applying a function?

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Series New issue 3638 by skirpic...@gmail.com: Automatic series expansion while applying a function? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3638 Mathematica does so {{{ In[1]:= Tanh[Series[Sin[x], {x, 0, 5}]] Out[1]=

Re: Issue 3445 in sympy: Automate the release process

Comment #3 on issue 3445 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Automate the release process http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3445 Ok, let's do it. There are a lot of things (see the wiki page), and making the installers is actually the easiest part, but lets do it all. -- You received this

Re: Issue 3368 in sympy: Add binomial expansion for non integer powers: (a+b)^p, where p is non integer

Comment #11 on issue 3368 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Add binomial expansion for non integer powers: (a+b)^p, where p is non integer http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3368 https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1579 and https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1769 -- You received this

Re: Issue 3548 in sympy: Implement algorithm for solving quintics

Comment #12 on issue 3548 by prasoon9...@gmail.com: Implement algorithm for solving quintics http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3548 Here's the implementation: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1746/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 3083 in sympy: Not is still vectorized

Updates: Status: Valid Comment #3 on issue 3083 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Not is still vectorized http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3083 Yes, it looks like it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To unsubscribe

Re: Issue 3638 in sympy: Automatic series expansion while applying a function?

Comment #1 on issue 3638 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Automatic series expansion while applying a function? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3638 I'm not sure if we want this. Automatic evaluation is very difficult to have not happen, and can be a serious pain if you don't want

Re: Issue 3631 in sympy: Migrate from old assumptions to new assumptions

Comment #13 on issue 3631 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Migrate from old assumptions to new assumptions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3631 I think it would be a serious mistake to throw away a working system (the old assumptions) for the sake of an untested one with known

Issue 3639 in sympy: Should we remove old assumptions?

Status: NeedsDecision Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3639 by mrock...@gmail.com: Should we remove old assumptions? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3639 rlamy says I think it would be a serious mistake to throw away a working system (the old

Re: Issue 3639 in sympy: Should we remove old assumptions?

Updates: Cc: ronan.l...@gmail.com Labels: Assumptions Comment #1 on issue 3639 by mrock...@gmail.com: Should we remove old assumptions? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3639 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this

Re: Issue 3631 in sympy: Migrate from old assumptions to new assumptions

Updates: Blockedon: sympy:3639 Comment #14 on issue 3631 by mrock...@gmail.com: Migrate from old assumptions to new assumptions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3631 I've created an issue for that discussion. Again, I'd like for this issue to be mostly a table of

Re: Issue 3639 in sympy: Should we remove old assumptions?

Issue 3639: Should we remove old assumptions? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3639 This issue is now blocking issue sympy:3631. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3631 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue,

Re: Issue 3639 in sympy: Should we remove old assumptions?

Comment #3 on issue 3639 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Should we remove old assumptions? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3639 The issue is, can we refactor the core (or really do anything with it) if it still has the old assumptions sitting around. Now, a phase out period could

Re: Issue 3639 in sympy: Should we remove old assumptions?

Comment #4 on issue 3639 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Should we remove old assumptions? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3639 It depends what sort of refactoring you have in mind. Having the old assumptions around is not a problem in itself, IMO. -- You received this message

Re: Issue 3639 in sympy: Should we remove old assumptions?

Comment #5 on issue 3639 by mrock...@gmail.com: Should we remove old assumptions? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3639 It would be nice to remove some of the magic around Symbol. What will sympy use in general code? What will `is_positive` call? Old assumptions or new

Re: Issue 3639 in sympy: Should we remove old assumptions?

Comment #6 on issue 3639 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Should we remove old assumptions? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3639 Yes, this a real problem that could be fixed quite easily today (by having the new assumptions call the old ones), were it not for the fact that there

Issue 3640 in sympy: square roots in the denominator print as powers

Status: Valid Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium EasyToFix Printing New issue 3640 by asmeu...@gmail.com: square roots in the denominator print as powers http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3640 Previously: In [1]: 1/sqrt(x) Out[1]: 1 ─ ___ ╲╱ x but now: