Comment #4 on issue 2296 by skirpic...@gmail.com: x*x.conjugate() should be
recognized as real
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2296
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1923
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to th
Comment #43 on issue 93 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Square root denesting
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=93
But as far as I understand, nsimplify() is just a numeric heuristic. It's
possible to get two expressions that are very close (closer than the given
precision), but not equ
Comment #9 on issue 3710 by asmeu...@gmail.com: shallow expansion
feature/bug
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3710
This is the intended expansion in the codebase when expand_mul is used.
Since deep is automatically True, this also recurses through the entire
tree making ch
Comment #4 on issue 3300 by seange...@gmail.com: simplify should call
doit() on Subs instances
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3300
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1924
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to th
Comment #2 on issue 3712 by smi...@gmail.com: simplify cancels
inconsistently
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3712
It's because the "simpler expression" does not have a short ops count. If
you pass oo for the ratio you will get
simplify((x-y)*(40*z-20)/10,oo)
4*x*z - 2*x