Updates:
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Solvers
Comment #1 on issue 3722 by asmeu...@gmail.com: solve can try split
equation into real and imaginary parts
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3722
That's a great idea. When should it be tried? Always? When the variabl
Status: Valid
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3722 by smi...@gmail.com: solve can try split equation into real
and imaginary parts
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3722
The following does not resolve into a solution for x and y
var('x y', real=True)
Status: Valid
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3721 by smi...@gmail.com: solve should handle more than one abs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3721
Although solve handles one abs,
solve(abs(2*x+5),x)
[-5/2]
it fails for multiple abs:
solve(abs(2*x+5
Status: Valid
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3720 by smi...@gmail.com: powsimp should be attempted for
multiple generators case in solve
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3720
var('a,b,c,d',positive=True)
(a, b, c, d)
solve(a*b**x-c*d**x, x)
Traceb
Status: Valid
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Solvers
New issue 3719 by smi...@gmail.com: checksol seems to hang when checking
solutions of this eq:
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3719
print filldedent(eq)
sqrt(Abs(-5*x*(0.19*x*y + 0.05*y)/(x**2 + 25) + (1
Comment #5 on issue 1590 by smi...@gmail.com: Reduce powers of sin's and
cos's to multi-argument functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1590
from sympy.simplify.fu import *
TR7(TR5(eq)) # which is shorter than expand_sincos_powers(eq)
But if you use it a lot you can mak
Comment #2 on issue 3496 by mrock...@gmail.com: Assumptions known_facts
only apply to atomic expressions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3496
How are you forming X and Y?
This is from the current master branch
mrocklin@notebook:~/workspace/sympy$ git pull sympy master
mrockl
Comment #1 on issue 3496 by rishabhd...@gmail.com: Assumptions known_facts
only apply to atomic expressions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3496
I am getting None even for ask(Q.lower_triangular(X+Y),
Q.lower_triangular(X) & Q.lower_triangular(Y)):
print ask(Q.lower_triang
Issue 3662: Sum and Integral (and possibly Product) should have a common
superclass
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3662
This issue is now blocking issue sympy:2214.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2214
--
You received this message because you are listed in
Updates:
Blockedon: sympy:3662
Comment #8 on issue 2214 by asmeu...@gmail.com: representation of Sum and
Integral should be unified
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2214
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is conf
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #8 on issue 3703 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Sum of a finite power
series performs automatic reduction which is not always valid
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3703
That was merged. If you find any other instances where summation should
rea
11 matches
Mail list logo