Comment #3 on issue 2152 by skirpic...@gmail.com: sin, cos, exp, re, im =
[abs]*5 in sympy/assumptions/handlers/sets.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2152
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1973
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Comment #2 on issue 3734 by skirpic...@gmail.com: SymPy thinks that gmpy
2.0.0 is too old
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3734
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1941
close?
btw, I'm not sure that import_module does right things, while doing a naive
version comparison (mo
Comment #8 on issue 2814 by patrick@gmail.com: ValueError: can't raise
polynomial to a negative power with solve()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2814
If I try
cancel((z/(x**2) + 0.1*z/sqrt(x**2))**2)
I get the
ValueError: can't raise polynomial to a negative power.
Is it
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 2152 by asmeu...@gmail.com: sin, cos, exp, re, im =
[abs]*5 in sympy/assumptions/handlers/sets.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2152
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this projec
Comment #8 on issue 3732 by gra...@gmail.com: Integration of Piecewise
function should also be continuous
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3732
Aaron, as suspected by me, the current implementation of _eval_integral for
Piecewise
returns incorrect results for Integral tra
Updates:
Cc: ness...@googlemail.com
Comment #9 on issue 3732 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Integration of Piecewise
function should also be continuous
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3732
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this pro
Comment #10 on issue 1850 by trel...@psu.edu: solve_linear_system contains
duplicate rref algorithm
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1850
Cool extension being able to specify the ring. When solving underdetermined
systems, you can specify the free variables by re-ordering the