Re: Issue 3738 in sympy: parse_expr with implicit_multiplication_application fails with some complex expressions

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3738 by krastano...@gmail.com: parse_expr with implicit_multiplication_application fails with some complex expressions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3738 https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1989 -- You received this message

Re: Issue 3635 in sympy: Backwards compatibility with old assumptions

Comment #7 on issue 3635 by gizmoabh...@gmail.com: Backwards compatibility with old assumptions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3635 I believe the API should be deprecated. Apart from that, while declaring an assumption, we can have an alternate better way. (Tell me what yo

Re: Issue 3737 in sympy: powers of -1 and I should flatten

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3737 by smi...@gmail.com: powers of -1 and I should flatten http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3737 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue no

Re: Issue 1993 in sympy: make sign simplification part of canonicalizing process

Updates: Cc: asmeu...@gmail.com skirpic...@gmail.com Comment #7 on issue 1993 by smi...@gmail.com: make sign simplification part of canonicalizing process http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1993 An idea I had about making (1/(1 - t)).subs(t, 1) is that we could have a f

Issue 3739 in sympy: pip prints some "errors" when installing

Status: Valid Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3739 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: pip prints some "errors" when installing http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3739 It's probably harmless, because things work just fine, but posting it here anyway. (xx)ondr

Re: Issue 3070 in sympy: cse raises error with RootOf

Comment #3 on issue 3070 by smi...@gmail.com: cse raises error with RootOf http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3070 In the preprocessing in cse, the expr, e, of a RootOf is identified as having an extractable sign. This ends up calling PurePoly(Neg(e)) -> PurePoly(Neg(e), Neg(e))

Re: Issue 2895 in sympy: minpoly hangs on this expresion

Comment #5 on issue 2895 by mario.pe...@gmail.com: minpoly hangs on this expresion http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2895 This bug is fixed in PR 1993 -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adj

Re: Issue 1993 in sympy: make sign simplification part of canonicalizing process

Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 978 Comment #8 on issue 1993 by smi...@gmail.com: make sign simplification part of canonicalizing process http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1993 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 978 in sympy: extract (-1) from all expressions canonically

Updates: Cc: asmeu...@gmail.com skirpic...@gmail.com Comment #14 on issue 978 by smi...@gmail.com: extract (-1) from all expressions canonically http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=978 Issue 1993 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because this p

Issue 3740 in sympy: Don't use \times in latex

Status: Valid Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Printing New issue 3740 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Don't use \times in latex http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3740 In [2]: latex(3*4**x) Out[2]: 3 \times 4^{x} This prints as 3 X 4^x, with a big X for \times, which looks r

Re: Issue 1235 in sympy: Problem installing in Windows

Comment #48 on issue 1235 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Problem installing in Windows http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1235 I guess you should push that patch upstream. In the meanwhile, we could just add a simple subclass of whatever class has those methods you changed. -- You re