Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 3738 by krastano...@gmail.com: parse_expr with
implicit_multiplication_application fails with some complex expressions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3738
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1989
--
You received this message
Comment #7 on issue 3635 by gizmoabh...@gmail.com: Backwards compatibility
with old assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3635
I believe the API should be deprecated.
Apart from that, while declaring an assumption, we can have an alternate
better way.
(Tell me what yo
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 3737 by smi...@gmail.com: powers of -1 and I should
flatten
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3737
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue no
Updates:
Cc: asmeu...@gmail.com skirpic...@gmail.com
Comment #7 on issue 1993 by smi...@gmail.com: make sign simplification part
of canonicalizing process
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1993
An idea I had about making (1/(1 - t)).subs(t, 1) is that we could have a
f
Status: Valid
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3739 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: pip prints some "errors" when
installing
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3739
It's probably harmless, because things work just fine, but posting it here
anyway.
(xx)ondr
Comment #3 on issue 3070 by smi...@gmail.com: cse raises error with RootOf
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3070
In the preprocessing in cse, the expr, e, of a RootOf is identified as
having an extractable sign. This ends up calling PurePoly(Neg(e)) ->
PurePoly(Neg(e), Neg(e))
Comment #5 on issue 2895 by mario.pe...@gmail.com: minpoly hangs on this
expresion
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2895
This bug is fixed in PR 1993
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adj
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 978
Comment #8 on issue 1993 by smi...@gmail.com: make sign simplification part
of canonicalizing process
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1993
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because
Updates:
Cc: asmeu...@gmail.com skirpic...@gmail.com
Comment #14 on issue 978 by smi...@gmail.com: extract (-1) from all
expressions canonically
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=978
Issue 1993 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because this p
Status: Valid
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Printing
New issue 3740 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Don't use \times in latex
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3740
In [2]: latex(3*4**x)
Out[2]: 3 \times 4^{x}
This prints as 3 X 4^x, with a big X for \times, which looks r
Comment #48 on issue 1235 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Problem installing in
Windows
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1235
I guess you should push that patch upstream. In the meanwhile, we could
just add a simple subclass of whatever class has those methods you changed.
--
You re
11 matches
Mail list logo