Issue 3748 in sympy: add tests for sho1d.py

Status: Valid Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low Quantum New issue 3748 by krastano...@gmail.com: add tests for sho1d.py http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3748 This pull request fixed some typos that should have never happened. Given that the number of PRs is very

Re: Issue 3748 in sympy: add tests for sho1d.py

Comment #1 on issue 3748 by aceb...@gmail.com: add tests for sho1d.py http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3748 I'm planning on fixing them as soon as possible. You're right, the tests are blatantly insufficient (there's 2 tests and none of them are using any options that are not

Re: Issue 3517 in sympy: Python 3 Sphinx docs include Python 2 source

Comment #2 on issue 3517 by julien.r...@gmail.com: Python 3 Sphinx docs include Python 2 source http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3517 It seems not to be the case anymore. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this

Re: Issue 3623 in sympy: Doc build warning with Sphinx 1.2

Comment #3 on issue 3623 by julien.r...@gmail.com: Doc build warning with Sphinx 1.2 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3623 Would it be acceptable to build the translation without turning warnings into errors? -- You received this message because this project is configured t

Re: Issue 3715 in sympy: ufuncify with logarithms

Comment #13 on issue 3715 by t.hi...@gmail.com: ufuncify with logarithms http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3715 see https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2007 Note that 'n' is not a attribute of expr.args -- You received this message because this project is configured to send

Re: Issue 3715 in sympy: ufuncify with logarithms

Comment #14 on issue 3715 by t.hi...@gmail.com: ufuncify with logarithms http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3715 Because expr.args is a tuple: (10,) in the example provided in the first comment. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue

Re: Issue 3715 in sympy: ufuncify with logarithms

Comment #15 on issue 3715 by julien.r...@gmail.com: ufuncify with logarithms http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3715 I probably was thinking to replace expr.args with map(N, expr.args). -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notification

Re: Issue 3715 in sympy: ufuncify with logarithms

Comment #16 on issue 3715 by asmeu...@gmail.com: ufuncify with logarithms http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3715 But what if the expression is nested, like log(log(10))? -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this addre

Re: Issue 1339 in sympy: rendering partial derivatives instead of d?

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 1339 by asmeu...@gmail.com: rendering partial derivatives instead of d? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1339 This was fixed In [25]: diff(bell(x, n), x) Out[25]: d ──(bell(x, n)) dx In [27]: diff(f(x, y), x) Out[27]: ∂ ──(f(

Re: Issue 1038 in sympy: (sin(x)*cos(x)).series(x, 0, 1000) takes forever

Comment #25 on issue 1038 by hacm...@gmail.com: (sin(x)*cos(x)).series(x, 0, 1000) takes forever http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1038 If I were to derive this particular series by hand, I would convert it to sin(2*x)/2 and then then nth coefficient would be trivial to find.

Re: Issue 886 in sympy: simplify for general functions and derivatives could be improved

Updates: Summary: simplify for general functions and derivatives could be improved Comment #11 on issue 886 by smi...@gmail.com: simplify for general functions and derivatives could be improved http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=886 (No comment was entered for this chang