Status: Valid
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low Quantum
New issue 3748 by krastano...@gmail.com: add tests for sho1d.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3748
This pull request fixed some typos that should have never happened. Given
that the number of PRs is very
Comment #1 on issue 3748 by aceb...@gmail.com: add tests for sho1d.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3748
I'm planning on fixing them as soon as possible. You're right, the tests
are blatantly insufficient (there's 2 tests and none of them are using any
options that are not
Comment #2 on issue 3517 by julien.r...@gmail.com: Python 3 Sphinx docs
include Python 2 source
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3517
It seems not to be the case anymore.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this
Comment #3 on issue 3623 by julien.r...@gmail.com: Doc build warning with
Sphinx 1.2
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3623
Would it be acceptable to build the translation without turning warnings
into errors?
--
You received this message because this project is configured t
Comment #13 on issue 3715 by t.hi...@gmail.com: ufuncify with logarithms
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3715
see https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2007
Note that 'n' is not a attribute of expr.args
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send
Comment #14 on issue 3715 by t.hi...@gmail.com: ufuncify with logarithms
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3715
Because expr.args is a tuple: (10,) in the example provided in the first
comment.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Comment #15 on issue 3715 by julien.r...@gmail.com: ufuncify with logarithms
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3715
I probably was thinking to replace expr.args with map(N, expr.args).
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notification
Comment #16 on issue 3715 by asmeu...@gmail.com: ufuncify with logarithms
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3715
But what if the expression is nested, like log(log(10))?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this addre
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 1339 by asmeu...@gmail.com: rendering partial
derivatives instead of d?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1339
This was fixed
In [25]: diff(bell(x, n), x)
Out[25]:
d
──(bell(x, n))
dx
In [27]: diff(f(x, y), x)
Out[27]:
∂
──(f(
Comment #25 on issue 1038 by hacm...@gmail.com: (sin(x)*cos(x)).series(x,
0, 1000) takes forever
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1038
If I were to derive this particular series by hand, I would convert it to
sin(2*x)/2 and then then nth coefficient would be trivial to find.
Updates:
Summary: simplify for general functions and derivatives could be
improved
Comment #11 on issue 886 by smi...@gmail.com: simplify for general
functions and derivatives could be improved
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=886
(No comment was entered for this chang
11 matches
Mail list logo