Issue 3785 in sympy: log(Rational(3,10),10) regression

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3785 by peterj...@gmail.com: log(Rational(3,10),10) regression http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3785 At gitref `366591a`, the following runs without error: Python 2.7.2 (default, Oct 11 2012, 20:14:37) [GCC

Re: Issue 3743 in sympy: dummy_eq fails with Sum

Updates: Status: Duplicate Labels: -EasyToFix Mergedinto: 2440 Comment #7 on issue 3743 by smi...@gmail.com: dummy_eq fails with Sum http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3743 dummy_eq should not be used for comparing things with structural dummy variables;

Re: Issue 2440 in sympy: Equal Integrals compare different when using different variables

Comment #19 on issue 2440 by smi...@gmail.com: Equal Integrals compare different when using different variables http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2440 Issue 3743 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all

Re: Issue 2440 in sympy: Equal Integrals compare different when using different variables

Issue 2440: Equal Integrals compare different when using different variables http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2440 This issue is now blocking issue sympy:2566. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2566 -- You received this message because you are listed in the

Re: Issue 2566 in sympy: Equating Sums shouldn't depend on dummy variables

Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 2440 Blockedon: -sympy:2440 sympy:2440 Comment #7 on issue 2566 by smi...@gmail.com: Equating Sums shouldn't depend on dummy variables http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2566 (No comment was entered for this change.)

Re: Issue 2440 in sympy: Equal Integrals compare different when using different variables

Issue 2440: Equal Integrals compare different when using different variables http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2440 This issue is now blocking issue sympy:2566. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2566 -- You received this message because you are listed in the

Re: Issue 3786 in sympy: Sum and Product subs problems

Updates: Labels: smichr NeedsReview Comment #1 on issue 3786 by smi...@gmail.com: Sum and Product subs problems http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3786 https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2054 -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all

3 issues changed in sympy

Updates: Status: Started Owner: julien.r...@gmail.com Blocking: -sympy:2632 sympy:2632 Comment by julien.r...@gmail.com: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2045 Affected issues: issue 2945: Make init_printing() work with latex printing in the IPython qtconsole and

Re: Issue 2832 in sympy: bool(Relational) should raise ValueError

Issue 2832: bool(Relational) should raise ValueError http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2832 This issue is now blocking issue sympy:2961. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2961 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

Re: Issue 2832 in sympy: bool(Relational) should raise ValueError

Issue 2832: bool(Relational) should raise ValueError http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2832 This issue is now blocking issue sympy:2961. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2961 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

Re: Issue 2961 in sympy: __nonzero__ method of Rel breaks solve of Piecewise functions

Updates: Status: Started Owner: julien.r...@gmail.com Labels: NeedsReview Blockedon: -sympy:2832 sympy:2832 Comment #2 on issue 2961 by julien.r...@gmail.com: __nonzero__ method of Rel breaks solve of Piecewise functions

Issue 3787 in sympy: DS_Store files still in sympy 0.7.2

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3787 by kcris...@gmail.com: DS_Store files still in sympy 0.7.2 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3787 See Sage issue http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13604 Apparently some of them were removed by

Re: Issue 3056 in sympy: Closed-form results of sums of meijerg functions

Comment #5 on issue 3056 by skirpic...@gmail.com: Closed-form results of sums of meijerg functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3056 The second one gives -π⋅(sinh(2⋅π⋅a⋅w) - cosh(2⋅π⋅a⋅w)) ── a w/o any assumptions. -- You

Re: Issue 3057 in sympy: Closed form results for meijerg functions

Comment #9 on issue 3057 by skirpic...@gmail.com: Closed form results for meijerg functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3057 First example returns: ___ ⎛(2⋅Si(a⋅w) - π)⋅sin(a⋅w) ⎞ -╲╱ 2 ⋅⎜ + cos(a⋅w)⋅Ci(a⋅w)⎟ ⎝

Re: Issue 3787 in sympy: DS_Store files still in sympy 0.7.2

Updates: Status: Valid Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.3 Comment #1 on issue 3787 by asmeu...@gmail.com: DS_Store files still in sympy 0.7.2 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3787 Yep, I see them there in the tarball. Even if we don't figure out what causes

Re: Issue 3785 in sympy: log(Rational(3,10),10) regression

Comment #2 on issue 3785 by peterj...@gmail.com: log(Rational(3,10),10) regression http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3785 Solves my issue and looks good here - thanks =) The only minor part I can't seem to explain is why the multiplicity method signature now takes **kwargs

Re: Issue 3787 in sympy: DS_Store files still in sympy 0.7.2

Comment #2 on issue 3787 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: DS_Store files still in sympy 0.7.2 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3787 The issue #3445 should fix it. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You

Re: Issue 3445 in sympy: Automate the release process

Issue 3445: Automate the release process http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3445 This issue is now blocking issue sympy:3787. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3787 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 3787 in sympy: DS_Store files still in sympy 0.7.2

Updates: Blockedon: sympy:3445 Comment #3 on issue 3787 by asmeu...@gmail.com: DS_Store files still in sympy 0.7.2 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3787 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this project is configured to send

Re: Issue 3786 in sympy: Sum and Product subs problems

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3786 by smi...@gmail.com: Sum and Product subs problems http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3786 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue

Re: Comment on DownloadInstallation in sympy

Comment by pniculq...@gmail.com: When I write: python setup.py install The terminal answer me: python: can't open file ´setup.py':[Errno 2] No such file or directory For more information: http://code.google.com/p/sympy/wiki/DownloadInstallation -- You received this message because you are

Issue 3788 in sympy: recognize special powers like b**(1/log(b)) as E

Status: Valid Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3788 by smi...@gmail.com: recognize special powers like b**(1/log(b)) as E http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3788 log(-3, R(1,3)) -(log(3) + I*pi)/log(3) solve((-3)**x-R(1,3)**_) [log(3**(1 +

Issue 3790 in sympy: log should handle separate bases symbolically

Status: Valid Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 3790 by asmeu...@gmail.com: log should handle separate bases symbolically http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3790 Currently log(x, b) returns log(x)/log(b), but I think it should just stay as log(x,

Issue 3789 in sympy: log should handle separate bases symbolically

Status: Valid Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 3789 by asmeu...@gmail.com: log should handle separate bases symbolically http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3789 Currently log(x, b) returns log(x)/log(b), but I think it should just stay as log(x,