Re: Issue 2451 in sympy: Position of power (and function) in pretty printed functions

2013-06-25 Thread sympy
Comment #3 on issue 2451 by pradyu1...@gmail.com: Position of power (and function) in pretty printed functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2451 https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2207 I made pull request implementing patch for this issue. -- You received this message

Re: Issue 3128 in sympy: Sum and Product manipulations

2013-06-25 Thread sympy
Comment #22 on issue 3128 by trel...@psu.edu: Sum and Product manipulations http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3128 I've posted my edits to subs, expand, and factor for Sum. See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2198 It seems summation notation in it's classical form is not up to

Re: Issue 3128 in sympy: Sum and Product manipulations

2013-06-25 Thread sympy
Comment #23 on issue 3128 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Sum and Product manipulations http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3128 1. I think summations with reversed limits is a bit of a corner case anyway for such an audience. 2. Why not? 3. Not using the Karr convention is what leads

Issue 3905 in sympy: Doctest failure in sympy.printing.dot.dotprint

2013-06-25 Thread sympy
Status: Valid Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High New issue 3905 by thilina@gmail.com: Doctest failure in sympy.printing.dot.dotprint http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3905 Following failure occurs when testing in Python 2.5. It passes for Python version 2.6, 2.7

Re: Issue 3905 in sympy: Doctest failure in sympy.printing.dot.dotprint

2013-06-25 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: Printing Comment #1 on issue 3905 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Doctest failure in sympy.printing.dot.dotprint http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3905 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this project is configured to s

Re: Issue 3809 in sympy: isprime can be faster

2013-06-25 Thread sympy
Comment #41 on issue 3809 by dana.jac...@gmail.com: isprime can be faster http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3809 I have a fork with a complete rewrite. I need to do more testing before doing a pull request. I'm not sure what the normal review process is -- do a pull request a

Re: Issue 3809 in sympy: isprime can be faster

2013-06-25 Thread sympy
Comment #42 on issue 3809 by cas...@gmail.com: isprime can be faster http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3809 I thought I had fixed is_bpsw_prp() and is_strong_bpsw_prp() in gmpy2 2.0.0. :( I committed a fix to the svn repository (r813). Can you give that a try? There is a versi

Re: Issue 3905 in sympy: Doctest failure in sympy.printing.dot.dotprint

2013-06-25 Thread sympy
Comment #2 on issue 3905 by thilina@gmail.com: Doctest failure in sympy.printing.dot.dotprint http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3905 "depth"="1" is not included in the example. I guess that's the problem. -- You received this message because this project is configured to se

Re: Issue 3809 in sympy: isprime can be faster

2013-06-25 Thread sympy
Comment #43 on issue 3809 by dana.jac...@gmail.com: isprime can be faster http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3809 Case, Yes, the dev version works (and does the strong test, yay). Trying to verify with Feistma's database, I found this segfaults: is_strong_selfridge_prp("2047"