Status: Valid
Owner:
CC: mrock...@gmail.com, ness...@googlemail.com, ronan.l...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Assumptions
New issue 3929 by asmeu...@gmail.com: New assumptions handlers should use
logic satisfiability as much as possible
Comment #15 on issue 3222 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Memory problems with the
cache
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3222
By the way, the cache actually makes memory usage better in some cases,
because it prevents multiple instances of the same object from being
created. We
Updates:
Cc: mrock...@gmail.com ronan.l...@gmail.com ness...@googlemail.com
Comment #2 on issue 3929 by asmeu...@gmail.com: New assumptions handlers
should use logic satisfiability as much as possible
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3929
Yes, exactly. I think once we
Comment #3 on issue 3929 by asmeu...@gmail.com: New assumptions handlers
should use logic satisfiability as much as possible
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3929
By the way, an annoying bug I found when playing with this. If you pass the
Q.zero(x) type predicates to
Comment #4 on issue 3929 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: New assumptions handlers
should use logic satisfiability as much as possible
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3929
By the way, did you remove the CCs because it was bugging you about the
email.
Yes, exactly.
--
You
Comment #6 on issue 3445 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Automate the release process
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3445
Significant work on this at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2256 (in
the 0.7.3 branch).
--
You received this message because this project is configured to
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 3787 by asmeu...@gmail.com: DS_Store files still in
sympy 0.7.2
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3787
In addition to the new fabric/vagrant scripts being very unlikely to do
something like this, I also implemented a check
