Re: Issue 464 in sympy: _eval_as_leading_term should be refactored

2013-10-20 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #11 on issue 464 by skirpic...@gmail.com: _eval_as_leading_term should be refactored http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=464 Ok, lets close this. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notificatio

Issue 4064 in sympy: integrate((sign(x - 1) - sign(x - 2))*cos(x), x) raises TypeError: doit() got an unexpected keyword argument 'manual'

2013-10-20 Thread sympy
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 4064 by ppue...@googlemail.com: integrate((sign(x - 1) - sign(x - 2))*cos(x), x) raises TypeError: doit() got an unexpected keyword argument 'manual' http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=4064 In [63]: integrate

Issue 4065 in sympy: integrate(integrate(x/(x**2 + y**2), (y, -oo, oo)), (x, a, b)) maximum recursion depth exceeded

2013-10-20 Thread sympy
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 4065 by ppue...@googlemail.com: integrate(integrate(x/(x**2 + y**2), (y, -oo, oo)), (x, a, b)) maximum recursion depth exceeded http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=4065 from sympy import * a, b = symbols('a b',

Re: Issue 2639 in sympy: Product() is seriously broken

2013-10-20 Thread sympy
Comment #22 on issue 2639 by trel...@psu.edu: Product() is seriously broken http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2639 I think this issue can now be closed. In [1]: Product(n,(n,1,2)) Out[1]: 2 ┬───┬ │ │ n │ │ n = 1 In [2]: _.doit() Out[2]: 2 In [3]: Product(x*y, (x, 1, 2), (y

Re: Issue 3662 in sympy: Sum and Integral (and possibly Product) should have a common superclass

2013-10-20 Thread sympy
Comment #7 on issue 3662 by trel...@psu.edu: Sum and Integral (and possibly Product) should have a common superclass http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3662 This is done. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this ad

Re: Issue 2214 in sympy: representation of Sum and Integral should be unified

2013-10-20 Thread sympy
Comment #9 on issue 2214 by trel...@psu.edu: representation of Sum and Integral should be unified http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2214 This is done. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adj

Re: Issue 2214 in sympy: representation of Sum and Integral should be unified

2013-10-20 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #10 on issue 2214 by asmeu...@gmail.com: representation of Sum and Integral should be unified http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2214 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this project is configured

Re: Issue 3662 in sympy: Sum and Integral (and possibly Product) should have a common superclass

2013-10-20 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #8 on issue 3662 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Sum and Integral (and possibly Product) should have a common superclass http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3662 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this proj

Re: Issue 2639 in sympy: Product() is seriously broken

2013-10-20 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #23 on issue 2639 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Product() is seriously broken http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2639 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue not