Comment #5 on issue 1077 by sherjilo...@gmail.com: pi, EulerGamma in
Algebraic
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1077
This issue has been fixed.
In [36]: E.is_AlgebraicNumber
Out[36]: False
In [37]: pi.is_AlgebraicNumber
Out[37]: False
In [38]: EulerGamma.is_AlgebraicNumber
Comment #6 on issue 1077 by sherjilo...@gmail.com: pi, EulerGamma in
Algebraic
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1077
No, It hasn't. I'm working on it.
Which name is preferred, .is_AlgebraicNumber or is_algebraic ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Comment #7 on issue 1077 by sherjilo...@gmail.com: pi, EulerGamma in
Algebraic
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1077
see https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/223
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this
Comment #8 on issue 1077 by Vinzent.Steinberg: pi, EulerGamma in Algebraic
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1077
Maybe we should rather remove this function completely, because it is very
hard to determine whether a number algebraic or not.
For example, sin(1) is not algebraic
Updates:
Cc: matt...@gmail.com
Comment #9 on issue 1077 by asmeurer: pi, EulerGamma in Algebraic
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1077
I think it is worthy to have it. While it will have to return None in
quite a few cases, there are several cases where it can return so
