Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #9 on issue 1127 by smi...@gmail.com:
integrate(2*a/2*a)**2+x**2))**(3/2)),x) gives traceback
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1127
This was fixed by another pull request. There was a test in 1005 but the
review process is pretty
Comment #8 on issue 1127 by smi...@gmail.com:
integrate(2*a/2*a)**2+x**2))**(3/2)),x) gives traceback
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1127
This fails for a new reason (misuse of new_rawargs);
nsimplify(integrate(2*a/2*a)**2 + x**2))**1.5), x).n(2))
Traceback (most
Updates:
Blockedon: 790
Comment #7 on issue 1127 by asmeurer:
integrate(2*a/2*a)**2+x**2))**(3/2)),x) gives traceback
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1127
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Comment #6 on issue 1127 by asmeurer:
integrate(2*a/2*a)**2+x**2))**(3/2)),x) gives traceback
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1127
The last one is the same as issue 1851. The one in comment 4 does not fail
if you use Rationals in the
exponents (though it returns an
Comment #5 on issue 1127 by asmeurer:
integrate(2*a/2*a)**2+x**2))**(3/2)),x) gives traceback
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1127
And here is yet another one. Expanding the expression makes it pass. It
looks like the algorithm is making
some kind of invalid assumption
Updates:
Labels: Integration
Comment #4 on issue 1127 by asmeurer:
integrate(2*a/2*a)**2+x**2))**(3/2)),x) gives traceback
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1127
I have found another integral that does this:
integrate(-(1 + (-x + x**2)**(1/2))/(-x + (1 + (-x +
