Comment #6 on issue 1328 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: improvements to our
bin/test framework
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1328
Fine with me.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email t
Comment #5 on issue 1328 by asmeurer: improvements to our bin/test framework
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1328
Well, doing it automatically would be nice. I'll ask on the tox mailing
list to see what they think.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
Comment #4 on issue 1328 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: improvements to our
bin/test framework
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1328
It's actually possible to run Tox in parallel, you just have to do it
manually (-e py25 in one shell, -e py26 in another). It's not perfect (eg.
s
Comment #3 on issue 1328 by asmeurer: improvements to our bin/test framework
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1328
Parallel tests might be nice, though actually I don't think we really need
them. It's better to just run multiple tests from different Pythons at
once. It would
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #2 on issue 1328 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: improvements to our
bin/test framework
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1328
I think this is not relevant anymore:
* I don't think parallel runs are that important. If the only concern is
to
Status: Accepted
Owner: ondrej.certik
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1328 by ondrej.certik: improvements to our bin/test framework
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1328
* parallel runs (working on it)
From Fernando's email:
* Handle handle doctests written with i
