Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch
Comment #10 on issue 1625 by julien.r...@gmail.com: sympify of logical
operations gets confused with ==
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1625
Unfortunately this has stalled.
--
You received this message because this projec
Comment #9 on issue 1625 by krastano...@gmail.com: sympify of logical
operations gets confused with ==
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1625
Please check https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1541
It should be simple enough for an immediate merge (after testing).
--
You receive
Comment #8 on issue 1625 by asmeu...@gmail.com: sympify of logical
operations gets confused with ==
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1625
It looks like it got stalled. See the pull request.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-i
Comment #7 on issue 1625 by vex...@gmail.com: sympify of logical operations
gets confused with ==
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1625
I was wondering what the status of this is?
Cheers
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issu
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #6 on issue 1625 by krastano...@gmail.com: sympify of logical
operations gets confused with ==
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1625
check https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1378
--
You received this message because you are subscri
Comment #5 on issue 1625 by vex...@gmail.com: sympify of logical operations
gets confused with ==
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1625
Perhaps a single equals can denote mathematical equality in a string to be
parsed by sympify?
--
You received this message because you are
Updates:
Status: Valid
Labels: Parsing
Comment #4 on issue 1625 by asmeu...@gmail.com: sympify of logical
operations gets confused with ==
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1625
You get False because == tests exact equality. See
http://docs.sympy.org/0.7.1/gotc
Comment #3 on issue 1625 by vex...@gmail.com: sympify of logical operations
gets confused with ==
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1625
I agree, this is most confusing.
== is supposed to be a shortcut for Relactional(x, y, "=="), yet sympify
seems to do it's own thing:
In
Comment #2 on issue 1625 by tom.denniston: sympify of logical operations
gets confused with ==
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1625
That makes a ton of sense to me.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you star
Comment #1 on issue 1625 by asmeurer: sympify of logical operations gets
confused with ==
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1625
I think it should handle single equals signs too. For example, an Equality
copied from Maple will have the single
equals sign '=' in it, and it is t
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1625 by tom.denniston: sympify of logical operations gets
confused with ==
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1625
I am using sympy 0.6.5 on linux but I see the behavior on windows too.
In [10]: sympy.sympify('
11 matches
Mail list logo