Comment #6 on issue 1835 by smi...@gmail.com: 1835: coeff changes
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1835
This is in without the exact keyword functionality. A pull removing this
keyword is forthcoming.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #7 on issue 1835 by smi...@gmail.com: 1835: coeff changes
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1835
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To
Updates:
Blockedon: -1766 1980 2114
Comment #5 on issue 1835 by smichr: 1835: coeff changes
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1835
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/53
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To
Updates:
Labels: smichr
Comment #4 on issue 1835 by asmeurer: 1835: coeff changes
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1835
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to
Comment #1 on issue 1835 by smichr: 1835: coeff changes
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1835
It handles noncommutatives in a manner...there are some questions in the
commit about
it, though. e.g. should (n1*n2 + x*n1).coeff(n1) == 1 + x? Also, its
handling of
Comment #2 on issue 1835 by smichr: 1835: coeff changes
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1835
OK, I think this is the right behavior: n and m are non-commutative
(n*m + m*n*m).coeff(n) # = (1 + m)*n*m
1 + m
(n*m + m*n*m).coeff(n, right=True) # = (1 +
Status: Accepted
Owner: smichr
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview
New issue 1835 by smichr: 1835: coeff changes
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1835
1835: coeff changes
coeff now uses extract multiplicatively to find terms containing
the quantity of
