Issue 1884: remove old assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884
This issue is now blocking issue sympy:1941.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1941
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because
Issue 1884: remove old assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884
This issue is now blocking issue sympy:1941.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1941
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because
Issue 1884: remove old assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884
This issue is now blocking issue 1941.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1941
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you
Updates:
Labels: Vinzent.Steinberg
Comment #18 on issue 1884 by asmeurer: remove old assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues
Comment #16 on issue 1884 by Vinzent.Steinberg: remove old assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884
Rebased the new_assump branch on master.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to this group, send
Comment #17 on issue 1884 by Vinzent.Steinberg: remove old assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884
Current problems are some random failures for unknown reasons. Also I could
not yet debug why symbols() does not get to the correct scope (see the
go_back kwarg and
Issue 1884: remove old assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884
This issue is now blocking issue 1908.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you
Comment #9 on issue 1884 by Vinzent.Steinberg: remove old assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884
Issue 1615 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
Updates:
Cc: mattpap
Comment #10 on issue 1884 by Vinzent.Steinberg: remove old assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884
Mateusz, I addressed the concerns you raised (except the slow And) in my
new_assump
branch. Is this what you meant? Do you think these
Comment #11 on issue 1884 by Vinzent.Steinberg: remove old assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884
Actually, the speed difference is not as big as I expected:
In [6]: %timeit x.is_positive
100 loops, best of 3: 393 ns per loop
In [7]: %timeit ask(x, Q.positive)
Comment #12 on issue 1884 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: remove old assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884
I don't quite understand the point of this inspect magic. What is the
difference with
explicitly creating an AssumptionsContext() instance? (which, BTW, is just a
Updates:
Summary: remove old assumptions
Comment #8 on issue 1884 by Vinzent.Steinberg: remove old assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of
12 matches
Mail list logo
