Status: Accepted
Owner: smichr
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1899 by smichr: factor(3 + x - x*(1 + x) + x**2) != 3
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1899
factor(3 + x - x*(1 + x) + x**2), it seems, should reduce to 3. Instead (in
polys8) it just returns the same exp
Updates:
Cc: mattpap
Labels: Polynomial
Comment #1 on issue 1899 by asmeurer: factor(3 + x - x*(1 + x) + x**2) != 3
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1899
Well, factor() *is* the opposite of expand(), which does this fine.
So I guess the question is: Should factor(
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: mattpap
Cc: -mattpap
Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #2 on issue 1899 by mattpap: factor(3 + x - x*(1 + x) + x**2) != 3
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1899
This behavior of factor() is just a simple bug. In a
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #3 on issue 1899 by mattpap: factor(3 + x - x*(1 + x) + x**2) != 3
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1899
This was fixed on polys11 in commit
3b63cedf3aba15d284430dc817391e0a45f8c951.
--
You received this message because you are subs
Updates:
Labels: mattpap
Comment #4 on issue 1899 by asmeurer: factor(3 + x - x*(1 + x) + x**2) != 3
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1899
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #5 on issue 1899 by matt...@gmail.com: factor(3 + x - x*(1 + x) +
x**2) != 3
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1899
Uniform handling of arguments like `3 + x - x*(1 + x) + x**2` was
implemented ac
