Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #10 on issue 1900 by matt...@gmail.com: factor((1+2*x+x**2)**100)
works too hard
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1900
factor() has now symbolic capabilities, e.g.:
In [1]: %time factor((x**2 -
Updates:
Labels: mattpap
Comment #9 on issue 1900 by asmeurer: factor((1+2*x+x**2)**100) works too
hard
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1900
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: mattpap
Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.0 NeedsReview
Comment #6 on issue 1900 by mattpap: factor((1+2*x+x**2)**100) works too
hard
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1900
This issue was recently fixed in polys11 branch:
In
Comment #7 on issue 1900 by smichr: factor((1+2*x+x**2)**100) works too hard
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1900
That's good news. Thanks for the update. Looking forward to seeing the new
polys.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment #8 on issue 1900 by smichr: factor((1+2*x+x**2)**100) works too hard
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1900
btw I left a comment on
http://github.com/mattpap/sympy-polys/commit/e88c0d0. Do you read those
commit comments? I'm not sure where else to leave feedback for
Updates:
Labels: Polynomial
Comment #5 on issue 1900 by Vinzent.Steinberg: factor((1+2*x+x**2)**100)
works too hard
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1900
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Comment #3 on issue 1900 by mattpap: factor((1+2*x+x**2)**100) works too
hard
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1900
Well, not coding but just talking. Unfortunately during the following month
I won't
have much time for SymPy, due to my stay in US.
--
You received this
Comment #4 on issue 1900 by smichr: factor((1+2*x+x**2)**100) works too hard
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1900
regarding commnent 1: expanding. I wonder if it's possible to never use real
expansion on a polynomial/multinomial once it's been created. e.g. you
don't have to
Comment #1 on issue 1900 by mattpap: factor((1+2*x+x**2)**100) works too
hard
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1900
The procedure is as follows:
1. Expand
2. Square-free factor
3. Factor
The first two take majority of time in this case. This is the most general
approach
Comment #2 on issue 1900 by smichr: factor((1+2*x+x**2)**100) works too hard
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1900
I should say! You're coding up a storm.
My intent here is to record issues so we will know what sorts of things we
might want
the eventual pre-processor to be
Status: Accepted
Owner: smichr
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1900 by smichr: factor((1+2*x+x**2)**100) works too hard
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1900
For the above expression, factor is working too hard (in polys8) to get the
answer (1+x)**200. This should
11 matches
Mail list logo