Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #17 on issue 1903 by asmeurer: Unify Assume keys, ask keys and ask
handlers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1903
OK. So if an issue has been pushed in and completely fixed, you can close
it :)
--
You received this message because you
Comment #16 on issue 1903 by christian.muise: Unify Assume keys, ask keys
and ask handlers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1903
As Ronan stated, this has been pushed in. The concern raised on the final
commit is no longer valid as the new sat solver doesn't use the p1_true
Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-Release0.7.0 Milestone-Release0.7.1
Comment #15 on issue 1903 by asmeurer: Unify Assume keys, ask keys and ask
handlers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1903
So what is the state of this? Is what remains still priority?
--
You received this
Comment #14 on issue 1903 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Unify Assume keys, ask
keys and ask handlers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1903
It's in. I'll work on the last commit later, I don't think it's terribly
important since pl_true isn't really used anywhere.
--
You received
Comment #13 on issue 1903 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Unify Assume keys, ask
keys and ask handlers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1903
I understand that the review is positive except for the last commit, so
I'll push everything but that last commit tomorrow.
--
You received
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch
Comment #12 on issue 1903 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Unify Assume keys, ask keys
and ask handlers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1903
Christian, your review is as official as any other one. :) The main goal is
to catch thing
Comment #11 on issue 1903 by asmeurer: Unify Assume keys, ask keys and ask
handlers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1903
By the way, you can just start working off of this branch before it gets
merged in. It will probably increase its
chances of being pushed in (because you
Comment #10 on issue 1903 by asmeurer: Unify Assume keys, ask keys and ask
handlers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1903
You can set it up in your GitHub preferences to have it email you when
someone comments on a commit after
you. Also, I think if you watch Ronan's reposit
Updates:
Cc: ondrej.certik
Comment #9 on issue 1903 by christian.muise: Unify Assume keys, ask keys
and ask handlers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1903
So I've gone through and left comments throughout all of the commits[0].
I'm not sure
if I'll be notified for any
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Blockedon: -1928
Comment #8 on issue 1903 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Unify Assume keys, ask
keys and ask handlers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1903
I've cleaned up the code, which is now ready for review in the branch
"implement-Pr
Updates:
Cc: christian.muise
Blockedon: 1928
Comment #7 on issue 1903 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Unify Assume keys, ask
keys and ask handlers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1903
I think I've reached the end of what can be done without breaking backwards
compatib
Comment #6 on issue 1903 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Unify Assume keys, ask keys
and ask handlers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1903
No, it's a special read-only attribute. help(instance) always shows the
docstring
for the class.
It's possible to overwrite it for functions and
Comment #5 on issue 1903 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Unify Assume keys, ask
keys and ask handlers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1903
Can't we just assign the __doc__ attribute?
No, it's a special read-only attribute. help(instance) always shows the
docstring for
the class
Updates:
Cc: fab...@fseoane.net
Comment #4 on issue 1903 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Unify Assume keys, ask keys
and ask handlers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1903
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
Comment #3 on issue 1903 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Unify Assume keys, ask keys
and ask handlers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1903
Not simply, because Q.complex is still an ordinary object, not a class or
a function.
Can't we just assign the __doc__ attribute?
+return e
Comment #2 on issue 1903 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Unify Assume keys, ask
keys and ask handlers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1903
Not simply, because Q.complex is still an ordinary object, not a class or a
function.
However, there are 2 ways to have docstrings: either make
Comment #1 on issue 1903 by asmeurer: Unify Assume keys, ask keys and ask
handlers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1903
With this way, is it possible to have docstrings for the assumptions in Q,
i.e., make help(Q.complex) work?
--
You received this message because you are
Status: Started
Owner: ronan.l...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Milestone-Release0.7.0 Assumptions
New issue 1903 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Unify Assume keys, ask keys and ask
handlers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1903
Assume keys, ask keys and ask handlers c
18 matches
Mail list logo
