Issue 1908: more efficient core
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908
This issue is now blocking issue sympy:1941.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1941
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you
Issue 1908: more efficient core
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908
This issue is now blocking issue sympy:1941.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1941
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you
Issue 1908: more efficient core
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908
This issue is now blocking issue 1941.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1941
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you
Updates:
Summary: more efficient core
Comment #7 on issue 1908 by Vinzent.Steinberg: more efficient core
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908
sympyx seems to be what we want. Do we need to get rid of the old
assumptions before
merging it?
--
You received this message
Comment #8 on issue 1908 by asmeurer: more efficient core
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908
Yeah, that was the other conclusion we came to.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may
