Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #10 on issue 1950 by andy.ter...@gmail.com: Piecewise((x, 0 x),
(0, Eq(x, 0)), (-x, x 0))._eval_interval(x, -1, 1) is wrong
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1950
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/109
--
You received this
Comment #11 on issue 1950 by asmeurer: Piecewise((x, 0 x), (0, Eq(x, 0)),
(-x, x 0))._eval_interval(x, -1, 1) is wrong
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1950
Is there a reason why that pull request was closed?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Comment #12 on issue 1950 by andy.ter...@gmail.com: Piecewise((x, 0 x),
(0, Eq(x, 0)), (-x, x 0))._eval_interval(x, -1, 1) is wrong
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1950
oh yeah I don't know how to use githubs pull requests. Anywho I updated it
to
Comment #13 on issue 1950 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Piecewise((x, 0 x), (0,
Eq(x, 0)), (-x, x 0))._eval_interval(x, -1, 1) is wrong
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1950
Is there a reason why that pull request was closed?
I think it got superseded by the newer one.
--
You
Comment #14 on issue 1950 by asmeurer: Piecewise((x, 0 x), (0, Eq(x, 0)),
(-x, x 0))._eval_interval(x, -1, 1) is wrong
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1950
Yeah, I actually asked that before he created the new one. I guess I am
just too quick.
--
You received this
Comment #1 on issue 1950 by andy.ter...@gmail.com: Piecewise((x, 0 x),
(0, Eq(x, 0)), (-x, x 0))._eval_interval(x, -1, 1) is wrong
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1950
Hmm, I'll take a closer look.
The code is complicated because function is dependent on which intervals
Comment #4 on issue 1950 by asmeurer: Piecewise((x, 0 x), (0, Eq(x, 0)),
(-x, x 0))._eval_interval(x, -1, 1) is wrong
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1950
What? I don't understand what you mean.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment #5 on issue 1950 by andy.ter...@gmail.com: Piecewise((x, 0 x),
(0, Eq(x, 0)), (-x, x 0))._eval_interval(x, -1, 1) is wrong
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1950
If you ignore the subinterval (oo, Eq(x, 0) then the miss its the
contribution to the interval.
Comment #6 on issue 1950 by asmeurer: Piecewise((x, 0 x), (0, Eq(x, 0)),
(-x, x 0))._eval_interval(x, -1, 1) is wrong
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1950
Measure zero intervals contribute nothing to an Integral. See the first
sentence of
Comment #9 on issue 1950 by andy.ter...@gmail.com: Piecewise((x, 0 x),
(0, Eq(x, 0)), (-x, x 0))._eval_interval(x, -1, 1) is wrong
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1950
Sure Riemann implies Lebegue but we don't have a notion of sets built into
piecewise functions. That's
Status: Accepted
Owner: asmeurer
CC: andy.terrel
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium WrongResult Integration
New issue 1950 by asmeurer: Piecewise((x, 0 x), (0, Eq(x, 0)), (-x, x
0))._eval_interval(x, -1, 1) is wrong
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1950
In [30]:
11 matches
Mail list logo
