Comment #6 on issue 1963 by smichr: changes to core/power
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1963
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/55
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to
Updates:
Labels: smichr
Comment #5 on issue 1963 by asmeurer: changes to core/power
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1963
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch NeedsReview
Comment #4 on issue 1963 by smichr: changes to core/power
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1963
Both changes have been made and repushed. (A little clean-up was also done
in test_expr.py.) If both num and den are negative
Status: Accepted
Owner: smichr
CC: asmeurer, Vinzent.Steinberg
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview
New issue 1963 by smichr: changes to core/power
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1963
This patch tries to get power's eval_power and as_numer_denom() to do more
with
Comment #1 on issue 1963 by smichr: changes to core/power
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1963
It's branch 1963 (single commit over master) at smichr's acct at github.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch
Comment #2 on issue 1963 by asmeurer: changes to core/power
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1963
I'm not particularly fond of
eq=eqn(npos, dpos, pow);assert eq.is_Pow and eq.as_numer_denom() ==
(npos**pow, dpos**pow)
Comment #3 on issue 1963 by smichr: changes to core/power
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1963
I will make those changes.
Regarding the behavior, it's (neg/neg)**x vs (neg/pos)**x. Unless sign
simplification is done to change the (neg/neg)**x to (pos/pos)**x one can't
break
