Status: Accepted
Owner: smichr
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2047 by smichr: subs_atoms should omit more variables when doing
subs in Integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2047
Since more than one atom can be passed to subs_atoms, care must be taken
that a
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #7 on issue 2047 by smi...@gmail.com: subs_atoms should omit more
variables when doing subs in Integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2047
Integral(x, (x, 1, y), (y, 1, 2)).subs({x:1, y:2}).doit()
2/3
--
You received this message bec
Comment #1 on issue 2047 by asmeurer: subs_atoms should omit more variables
when doing subs in Integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2047
subs_atoms was inadvertently pushed in and has been reverted (see issue
2046). If you like you can review it and it can be pushed in
Comment #2 on issue 2047 by smichr: subs_atoms should omit more variables
when doing subs in Integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2047
see issue 2046 for my comments.
Also, we should decide whether subs in an unevaluated integral should be
done based on pre-calculation
Updates:
Labels: Integration Matching
Comment #3 on issue 2047 by asmeurer: subs_atoms should omit more variables
when doing subs in Integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2047
Also, we should decide whether subs in an unevaluated integral should be
done based on p
Comment #4 on issue 2047 by smichr: subs_atoms should omit more variables
when doing subs in Integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2047
I believe I merged it all together in "50d489d subs-wild..." If you pull
it, checkout that commit. The last two commits are under constr
Comment #5 on issue 2047 by asmeurer: subs_atoms should omit more variables
when doing subs in Integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2047
I agree, don't replace the integration variable. Actually, all other
arguments aside, a good reason not to do it is that the integrat
Updates:
Labels: EasyToFix
Comment #6 on issue 2047 by smi...@gmail.com: subs_atoms should omit more
variables when doing subs in Integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2047
I believe this is fixed. This should be verified and then closed.
--
You received this messa