Issue 2047 in sympy: subs_atoms should omit more variables when doing subs in Integral

Status: Accepted Owner: smichr Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2047 by smichr: subs_atoms should omit more variables when doing subs in Integral http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2047 Since more than one atom can be passed to subs_atoms, care must be taken that a

Re: Issue 2047 in sympy: subs_atoms should omit more variables when doing subs in Integral

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #7 on issue 2047 by smi...@gmail.com: subs_atoms should omit more variables when doing subs in Integral http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2047 Integral(x, (x, 1, y), (y, 1, 2)).subs({x:1, y:2}).doit() 2/3 -- You received this message bec

Re: Issue 2047 in sympy: subs_atoms should omit more variables when doing subs in Integral

Comment #1 on issue 2047 by asmeurer: subs_atoms should omit more variables when doing subs in Integral http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2047 subs_atoms was inadvertently pushed in and has been reverted (see issue 2046). If you like you can review it and it can be pushed in

Re: Issue 2047 in sympy: subs_atoms should omit more variables when doing subs in Integral

Comment #2 on issue 2047 by smichr: subs_atoms should omit more variables when doing subs in Integral http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2047 see issue 2046 for my comments. Also, we should decide whether subs in an unevaluated integral should be done based on pre-calculation

Re: Issue 2047 in sympy: subs_atoms should omit more variables when doing subs in Integral

Updates: Labels: Integration Matching Comment #3 on issue 2047 by asmeurer: subs_atoms should omit more variables when doing subs in Integral http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2047 Also, we should decide whether subs in an unevaluated integral should be done based on p

Re: Issue 2047 in sympy: subs_atoms should omit more variables when doing subs in Integral

Comment #4 on issue 2047 by smichr: subs_atoms should omit more variables when doing subs in Integral http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2047 I believe I merged it all together in "50d489d subs-wild..." If you pull it, checkout that commit. The last two commits are under constr

Re: Issue 2047 in sympy: subs_atoms should omit more variables when doing subs in Integral

Comment #5 on issue 2047 by asmeurer: subs_atoms should omit more variables when doing subs in Integral http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2047 I agree, don't replace the integration variable. Actually, all other arguments aside, a good reason not to do it is that the integrat

Re: Issue 2047 in sympy: subs_atoms should omit more variables when doing subs in Integral

Updates: Labels: EasyToFix Comment #6 on issue 2047 by smi...@gmail.com: subs_atoms should omit more variables when doing subs in Integral http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2047 I believe this is fixed. This should be verified and then closed. -- You received this messa