Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2013-06-14 Thread sympy
Issue 2070: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 This issue is now blocking issue sympy:3890. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3890 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2013-02-19 Thread sympy
Comment #23 on issue 2070 by mrock...@gmail.com: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 Is it silly to drop this requirement and introduce isinstance(arg, Basic) checks everywhere? I like having leaves be ints and strings on occasion.

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2013-02-19 Thread sympy
Comment #24 on issue 2070 by asmeu...@gmail.com: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 It's not performance. It's just really nice to know that you can take any element of .args and apply the Basic interface to it. This makes recursive

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2013-01-23 Thread sympy
Issue 2070: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 This issue is now blocking issue sympy:3095. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3095 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2012-07-10 Thread sympy
Issue 2070: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 This issue is now blocking issue sympy:2710. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2710 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2012-07-10 Thread sympy
Issue 2070: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 This issue is now blocking issue sympy:2710. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2710 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2012-04-03 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview Comment #18 on issue 2070 by pr...@goodok.ru: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 Not clear what to review (both 7 and 504 are closed pull request). -- You received this message because you are

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2012-02-27 Thread sympy
Updates: Blockedon: 3112 Comment #17 on issue 2070 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2012-01-10 Thread sympy
Comment #15 on issue 2070 by smi...@gmail.com: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 Sets and Tuple can also hold non-Basic bools; that's why a custom _eval_subs had to be written for Set. -- You received this message because you are

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2011-11-15 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: Priority-High Comment #14 on issue 2070 by asmeu...@gmail.com: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 Regarding the failures in test_args.py, will any of those require changing the API to fix? If so, then that

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2011-09-30 Thread sympy
Issue 2070: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 This issue is now blocking issue 2710. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2710 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2011-05-02 Thread sympy
Updates: Blockedon: 2336 Comment #10 on issue 2070 by asmeurer: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 It looks like we have an issue with Basic args in Limit. See issue 2336. -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2011-03-26 Thread sympy
Updates: Blockedon: 2237 Comment #8 on issue 2070 by asmeurer: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 I was wondering, should we also stipulate the Expr args should be Expr? Can maybe someone come up with a counterexample as to why

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2011-03-26 Thread sympy
Comment #9 on issue 2070 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 Counterexample: well, Piecewise! (BTW, I don't understand the meaning or purpose of ExprCondPair) And yes, it would be useful to create Boolean

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2011-01-05 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: -Priority-High -Milestone-Release0.7.0 -markdewing -NeedsReview Comment #5 on issue 2070 by asmeurer: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 I might consider issue 1206 to be part of this (I need to look into it

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2010-12-14 Thread sympy
Comment #3 on issue 2070 by asmeurer: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/7 has taken care of the issues with Integral (it now uses Tuple, and instead of None, it uses a variable .arg format), as well

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2010-12-14 Thread sympy
Issue 2070: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 This issue is no longer blocking issue 2068. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2068 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2010-12-14 Thread sympy
Comment #4 on issue 2070 by ondrej.certik: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 Thanks for this writeup. I completely agree with what you wrote, and we should write some tests for these too. -- You received this message because you

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2010-10-04 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Started Labels: markdewing NeedsReview Comment #1 on issue 2070 by asmeurer: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 This has been started and is being reviewed at http://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/7. --

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2010-10-04 Thread sympy
Updates: Blockedon: 1936 1937 Comment #2 on issue 2070 by asmeurer: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 For Integral, both issue 1937 and issue 1936 need to be taken into account. Specifically for issue 1937, None is not an

Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2010-10-02 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: asmeurer Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High Milestone-Release0.7.0 New issue 2070 by asmeurer: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 There are two invariants that any .args attribute should uphold. The first is that

Re: Issue 2070 in sympy: All elements of .args should be Basic

2010-10-02 Thread sympy
Issue 2070: All elements of .args should be Basic http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070 This issue is now blocking issue 2068. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2068 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or