Re: Issue 2079 in sympy: multiple integral gives wrong result

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #10 on issue 2079 by smi...@gmail.com: multiple integral gives wrong result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2079 It looks like new issues were opened and pull request for other issues committed so I am closing this. -- You received th

Re: Issue 2079 in sympy: multiple integral gives wrong result

Comment #9 on issue 2079 by ness...@googlemail.com: multiple integral gives wrong result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2079 Compare new issues 2641 (limit) and 2642 (original integral). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-iss

Re: Issue 2079 in sympy: multiple integral gives wrong result

Updates: Labels: NeedsReview Comment #8 on issue 2079 by asmeurer: multiple integral gives wrong result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2079 See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/559 for the test. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr

Re: Issue 2079 in sympy: multiple integral gives wrong result

Comment #7 on issue 2079 by ness...@googlemail.com: multiple integral gives wrong result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2079 I fixed the _eval_interval() handling issue in gsoc-3 and added a test. I also fixed everything I said I would fix (and added tests). I will open i

Re: Issue 2079 in sympy: multiple integral gives wrong result

Comment #6 on issue 2079 by asmeurer: multiple integral gives wrong result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2079 So, this integral needs to be fixed, and the issues you address above should be fixed, but the problem here is rather unrelated. There was a bug in the way integra

Re: Issue 2079 in sympy: multiple integral gives wrong result

Comment #5 on issue 2079 by ness...@googlemail.com: multiple integral gives wrong result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2079 [I sent this by email while the tracker seemed to be down; sorry if it comes up twice now.] There are a couple of problems here, most of which are

Re: Issue 2079 in sympy: multiple integral gives wrong result

Comment #4 on issue 2079 by ness...@googlemail.com: multiple integral gives wrong result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2079 [I sent this by email while the tracker seemed to be down; sorry if it comes up twice now.] There are a couple of problems here, most of which are

Re: Issue 2079 in sympy: multiple integral gives wrong result

Updates: Cc: ness...@googlemail.com Labels: EasyToFix Comment #3 on issue 2079 by asmeurer: multiple integral gives wrong result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2079 It seems that this was fixed by the commit commit 238dbe82646a58a351e434621bfe6584b87b1553 Author

Re: Issue 2079 in sympy: multiple integral gives wrong result

Comment #2 on issue 2079 by asmeurer: multiple integral gives wrong result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2079 Yes, that is correct. Maple can actually take it a step further using the cosine integral, and Mathamatica (Wolfram Alpha) can take it all the way using hypergeome

Re: Issue 2079 in sympy: multiple integral gives wrong result

Comment #1 on issue 2079 by smichr: multiple integral gives wrong result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2079 It seems like it should have a double-integrand in y and z left. After successfully doing x it fails to do y and hence should fail z, too, and return the double integ

Issue 2079 in sympy: multiple integral gives wrong result

Status: Accepted Owner: asmeurer Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Integration WrongResult New issue 2079 by asmeurer: multiple integral gives wrong result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2079 In [84]: Integral(sin(x*y*z), (x, 0, pi), (y, 0, pi), (z, 0, pi)).doit() Out[84]: π ⌠