Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #4 on issue 2136 by asmeurer: polygamma expansion problems
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2136
This has been reviewed positively and pushed in.
--
You received this message because you are
Updates:
Blockedon: 2139
Comment #2 on issue 2136 by smichr: polygamma expansion problems
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2136
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #3 on issue 2136 by smichr: polygamma expansion problems
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2136
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/66
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues
Status: Accepted
Owner: smichr
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2136 by smichr: polygamma expansion problems
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2136
polygamma needs some attention since the expanded and unexpanded forms give
different results when substituting in a
Comment #1 on issue 2136 by asmeurer: polygamma expansion problems
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2136
Well, one doesn't have to substitute in values to see that this is messed
up:
In [1]: polygamma(0, 2*x).expand(func=True)
Out[1]: log(2) + polygamma(0, 2⋅x)
Clearly there
