Issue 2153 in sympy: min_ doesn't implement evaluation for its arguments unless they are Numbers

Status: Accepted Owner: smichr Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2153 by smichr: min_ doesn't implement evaluation for its arguments unless they are Numbers http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2153 min_ should pass off its evaluation as max_(-x, -y), I believe. If un

Re: Issue 2153 in sympy: min_ doesn't implement evaluation for its arguments unless they are Numbers

Comment #1 on issue 2153 by asmeurer: min_ doesn't implement evaluation for its arguments unless they are Numbers http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2153 The only code that uses min_ is Union._inf. I wonder if we should just replace it with the new assumptions system's inequal

Re: Issue 2153 in sympy: min_ doesn't implement evaluation for its arguments unless they are Numbers

Updates: Labels: smichr NeedsReview Comment #2 on issue 2153 by smichr: min_ doesn't implement evaluation for its arguments unless they are Numbers http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2153 It's a little subtle to reproduce the current behavior inline. It's probably worth

Re: Issue 2153 in sympy: min_ doesn't implement evaluation for its arguments unless they are Numbers

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 2153 by smi...@gmail.com: min_ doesn't implement evaluation for its arguments unless they are Numbers http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2153 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are