Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #9 on issue 2387 by asmeurer: Evalf of trig functions with
imaginary arguments
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2387
That was pushed in.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Comment #8 on issue 2387 by asmeurer: Evalf of trig functions with
imaginary arguments
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2387
This is now at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/378.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues
Updates:
Status: Started
Comment #7 on issue 2387 by asmeurer: Evalf of trig functions with
imaginary arguments
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2387
Apparently something was forgotten. See
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/376.
--
You received this message
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #6 on issue 2387 by ness...@googlemail.com: Evalf of trig functions
with imaginary arguments
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2387
This was pushed.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Labels: ness987 NeedsReview
Comment #5 on issue 2387 by ness...@googlemail.com: Evalf of trig functions
with imaginary arguments
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2387
Pull request: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/354
--
You received this message because
Comment #3 on issue 2387 by ness...@googlemail.com: Evalf of trig functions
with imaginary arguments
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2387
No this makes nsimplify((1/(exp(3*pi*x/5)+1))) enter an infinite loop.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Status: Accepted
Owner: ness...@googlemail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2387 by ness...@googlemail.com: Evalf of trig functions with
imaginary arguments
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2387
In [1]: cosh(sqrt(I+0.5)).n()
Out[1]:
⎛ ⎽⎞
cosh⎝╲╱
Comment #2 on issue 2387 by asmeurer: Evalf of trig functions with
imaginary arguments
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2387
Is that patch an actual solution? Or does it break stuff?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues
