Comment #10 on issue 2427 by mrock...@gmail.com: use free_symbols,
not .atoms() or .atoms(Symbol)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2427
I think that this is a hard task for someone who
1. is not very familiar with SymPy
2. is not familiar with the math being used. This task
Updates:
Labels: -CodeInDifficulty-Easy
Comment #11 on issue 2427 by asmeu...@gmail.com: use free_symbols,
not .atoms() or .atoms(Symbol)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2427
My experience last year is that the students can handle it, with our
guidance. Or else,
Updates:
Labels: CodeInImportedIntoSpreadsheet
Comment #3 on issue 2427 by krastano...@gmail.com: use free_symbols,
not .atoms() or .atoms(Symbol)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2427
Are you sure this should be rated as easy. For the moment I'm adding it to
the
Comment #4 on issue 2427 by asmeu...@gmail.com: use free_symbols,
not .atoms() or .atoms(Symbol)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2427
It doesn't seem difficult to me. Do you disagree?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues
Updates:
Summary: use free_symbols, not .atoms() or .atoms(Symbol)
Labels: CodeInCategory-Code CodeInDifficulty-Easy
Comment #1 on issue 2427 by asmeu...@gmail.com: use free_symbols,
not .atoms() or .atoms(Symbol)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2427
This also
