Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 2440
Blockedon: -sympy:2440 sympy:2440
Comment #7 on issue 2566 by smi...@gmail.com: Equating Sums shouldn't
depend on dummy variables
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2566
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Comment #4 on issue 2566 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Equating Sums shouldn't
depend on dummy variables
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2566
I'm increasingly against converting Symbols to Dummys internally. This
makes it impossible to do substitutions on the arguments. For
Comment #5 on issue 2566 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Equating Sums shouldn't
depend on dummy variables
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2566
The traceback is because you used a set instead of a dict.
I wonder what result you expected. Lambda(1/y, 2/y) doesn't make sense and
if
Status: Accepted
Owner: sean.v@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium WrongResult
New issue 2566 by sean.v@gmail.com: Equating Sums shouldn't depend on
dummy variables
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2566
When determining equality of sums, the dummy variables
Comment #1 on issue 2566 by asmeurer: Equating Sums shouldn't depend on
dummy variables
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2566
This is basically the same as issue 2440. We need to be consistant with our
use of internal dummy variables.
--
You received this message because
Updates:
Blockedon: 2440
Comment #2 on issue 2566 by asmeurer: Equating Sums shouldn't depend on
dummy variables
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2566
See the discussion on that issue. These should be fixed (or not fixed) at
the same time.
--
You received this
Comment #3 on issue 2566 by smi...@gmail.com: Equating Sums shouldn't
depend on dummy variables
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2566
IMO, since neither has any free_symbols, a test should be done by replacing
the symbols with equivalent symbols in both Sums and they should
