Comment #6 on issue 2664 by asmeu...@gmail.com: sign(x) should reduce to
x/abs(x) when x is known to not be 0
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2664
Yes I think that would be better.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 2664 by smi...@gmail.com: sign(x) should reduce to
x/abs(x) when x is known to not be 0
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2664
Now,
conjugate(x).diff(x)
Derivative(conjugate(x), x)
sign(1 + I)
sign(1 + I)
_.doit()
Updates:
Owner: julien.r...@gmail.com
Cc: asmeu...@gmail.com
Comment #5 on issue 2664 by julien.r...@gmail.com: sign(x) should reduce to
x/abs(x) when x is known to not be 0
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2664
One could have sign(1 + I) reduce automatically
Comment #3 on issue 2664 by julien.r...@gmail.com: sign(x) should reduce to
x/abs(x) when x is known to not be 0
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2664
In https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1271 sign(x).doit() reduces to
x/Abs(x).
--
You received this message because you
Status: Accepted
Owner: asmeurer
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2664 by asmeurer: sign(x) should reduce to x/abs(x) when x is
known to not be 0
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2664
sign(x) == x/abs(x) when x != 0 and 0 when x == 0. A lot of expressions
would
Updates:
Labels: Documentation
Comment #1 on issue 2664 by asmeurer: sign(x) should reduce to x/abs(x)
when x is known to not be 0
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2664
Also, the docstring needs to be updated.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
